From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Phillip Wood" <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
"Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>,
"Karthik Nayak" <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] interactive -p: add new `--rework-with-file` flag to interactive machinery
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 10:25:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8qd5g25o.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0fa65b429b4a5c33c4a2092e0e8d014a61e4569.1770390576.git.abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> (Abraham Samuel Adekunle's message of "Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:54:47 +0100")
Abraham Samuel Adekunle <abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com> writes:
> When using the interactive add, reset, stash or checkout machinery, we do
> not have the option of reworking with a file because the session automatically
> advances to the next file or ends if we have just one file, immediately all hunks
> in a file are decided on.
The last part of the sentence after the last comma does not read
very well, at least to me.
We recommend to fold lines in such a way that after a few e-mail
exchange and quoting it will still stay within 80-column, so a
practical fill-column value lies somewhere around ~70. Your lines a
slightly longer.
> Introduce the flag "--rework-with-file" when interactively selecting patches with the
> '--patch' option, which does not auto advance, thereby allowing users the option
> to rework with files.
> This ensures the current auto-advance method stays as the default method.
OK. There may be suggestions for better option names from others; I
do not think of any right now.
> diff --git a/add-interactive.h b/add-interactive.h
> index da49502b76..aef2feca56 100644
> --- a/add-interactive.h
> +++ b/add-interactive.h
> @@ -6,9 +6,10 @@
> struct add_p_opt {
> int context;
> int interhunkcontext;
> + int no_auto_advance;
> };
We add a new risk of double-negation confusion, e.g.,
if (!opt->no_auto_advance)
... do the auto-advance thing ...
where it may be easier to follow if it were written
if (opt->auto_advance)
... do the auto-advance thing ...
Would it make it harder to arrange the code if we made this member
"auto_advance" that defaults to "true"? We have ADD_P_OPT_INIT that
everybody is supposed to call already, like this
> -#define ADD_P_OPT_INIT { .context = -1, .interhunkcontext = -1 }
> +#define ADD_P_OPT_INIT { .context = -1, .interhunkcontext = -1, .no_auto_advance = 0 }
so I do not imagine it would be too much hassle.
> @@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ struct add_i_state {
>
> int use_single_key;
> char *interactive_diff_filter, *interactive_diff_algorithm;
> - int context, interhunkcontext;
> + int context, interhunkcontext, no_auto_advance;
> };
Likewise.
> diff --git a/builtin/add.c b/builtin/add.c
> index 32709794b3..408827cf54 100644
> --- a/builtin/add.c
> +++ b/builtin/add.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,8 @@ static struct option builtin_add_options[] = {
> OPT_GROUP(""),
> OPT_BOOL('i', "interactive", &add_interactive, N_("interactive picking")),
> OPT_BOOL('p', "patch", &patch_interactive, N_("select hunks interactively")),
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "rework-with-file", &add_p_opt.no_auto_advance,
> + N_("rework with files when selecting hunks interactively")),
Likewise.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 11:56 [RFC PATCH 0/1] add-patch: Allow reworking with a file after deciding on its hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-23 11:58 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] add-patch: Allow reworking with a file after deciding on all " Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-23 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-23 21:43 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-27 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Allow reworking with a file when making hunk decisions Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-27 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] Allow reworking with a file after deciding on all its hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-01-27 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-28 11:26 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-30 9:22 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-30 16:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-30 17:36 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-31 19:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-02 11:14 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-02 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-03 9:55 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-01-27 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Allow reworking with a file when making hunk decisions Junio C Hamano
2026-01-28 9:49 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] introduce new option `rework-with-file` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 15:54 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] interactive -p: add new `--rework-with-file` flag to interactive machinery Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 18:25 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-02-06 20:21 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] add-patch: Allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 18:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:22 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:32 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 19:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:37 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 10:32 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 17:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-12 21:13 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-12 21:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-12 22:20 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 15:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] add-patch: Allow proper 'git apply' when using the --rework-with-file flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-06 19:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:39 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-06 19:19 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] introduce new option `rework-with-file` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-06 20:40 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 22:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-14 9:16 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 23:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-14 10:14 ` Samuel Abraham
2026-02-13 22:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-13 22:12 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:01 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] interactive -p: add new `--auto-advance` flag Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:04 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] add-patch: modify patch_update_file() signature Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:06 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] add-patch: allow all-or-none application of patches Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-14 11:06 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] add-patch: allow interfile navigation when selecting hunks Abraham Samuel Adekunle
2026-02-20 22:32 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] introduce new option `--auto-advance` Junio C Hamano
2026-02-21 9:06 ` Samuel Abraham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq8qd5g25o.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=abrahamadekunle50@gmail.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox