From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b1-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EDD286416 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 14:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768400822; cv=none; b=fPG5vEs3Og4OdXJNnTMbW623HFe8t1Mmodk0cjK2/frmBL+1XoNXgD1KYTKgeTYxJwnWjUBzvCOFHpb4qFIOkUNHPsiCnLiBBvKhj85mb0o6yzyj86RIgBOjoO8r9NbxVx0rwNzK5Uud4Q6i2sIgmX0sZCeCBMFEQSA08F4xJzA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768400822; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BLjsHFtbivomjflKLLhNlGYMt+3rzvFalWstdAdL1E4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kIGGAQyHg2TvYy+ouav66Ljl59N4TBAa5kyrvHRC/0jA8SZxJYhm+gBuBv4Q6T5olRGPIl7on2tpseQa4E/iMIvRjF5nXAumEepv8QxPDcYMVrEvcPL+UcO0LG6JGbTZcF020roQEqB5EghlMXHEhh01Lj07xmwRJdBaFWfYHzw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=k/nwFHx3; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=AARYIisq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="k/nwFHx3"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="AARYIisq" Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDD67A0075; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1768400820; x=1768487220; bh=gDBEOMxLLH 8ggSxDUCAG3k4ccGVRhML+MIWUuRCZZeQ=; b=k/nwFHx3GW/T8uMY6/MLXtk2uN 65Ocuv25HMSyCJ3rLPW5bZoA+QCcUOcsS+B9/eA/vzj7bihKxWSoYsCKBQ3Le4QB v4IV6zfQ+F9qeOyuGb6p7cYOGJzY87y0ZIi3BSsJI305m6ROmRIbuo5Y++L/Uigl YvNFA7rWu5hT6FmE7lAiJKRBlIpNqVMt37SKOsfRTFfSu4VGu/VbUkQwBaJT5/2e 42oP3ZrMqs0FJpkrufVFWqUHXoj6wopjon6qd4/W5eYRpirPZhRr1zM8rPX4JOd6 ceH4R+RxrQcWQUONSf4fdHcmK3K+d8s9Xe754JY5lbxRdsnJ+OqgOA6Mmedw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1768400820; x=1768487220; bh=gDBEOMxLLH8ggSxDUCAG3k4ccGVRhML+MIW UuRCZZeQ=; b=AARYIisqkqno20DXtFTCPH+DcfW5+uFkWJTo3m3tOjJ+61oJSku UPaEg2x/iXjJ7w9i9mc+nEs+emGPAsiuorA2mk+5+W85P7Y595OMvwVpA/hTJSji zw3FwQBg4yn1/8Ryph2FerAjCSLYAwwsgezWlGG9LW8Z7y2HSHt03YjpiKVO3ftZ KGWrI4/xgeuoK08wrCxtHBtQEw+OdY2cthl7f/U4F5tH/smtqXAMj81482MdgQ3o zrKTb9XApopBN/OZns+UuX4SSAqwVNxX9Ed4a+s3bU5avmWjWR9h4aZu6k77xh3x S04qmyCFcx3VaKGP3QDR+ZCCEMayweMTKMw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdduvdefgedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnheptedttdevffeuieeilefffedtiefgfeekveetveevuedtlefhtddugfeltdej ledunecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpe dtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm pdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehpsh esphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdp rhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:26:59 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2026, #04) In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:20:50 +0100") References: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 06:26:58 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:10:13PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/read-object-info-improvements (2026-01-12) 8 commits >> - packfile: drop repository parameter from `packed_object_info()` >> - packfile: skip unpacking object header for disk size requests >> - packfile: disentangle return value of `packed_object_info()` >> - packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info >> - packfile: extend `is_delta` field to allow for "unknown" state >> - packfile: always declare object info to be OI_PACKED >> - object-file: always set OI_LOOSE when reading object info >> - Merge branch 'jc/object-read-stream-fix' into ps/read-object-info-improvements >> >> The object-info API has been cleaned up. >> >> Comments? >> source: <20260112-b4-pks-odb-read-object-info-improvements-v5-0-9a6124e95bf2@pks.im> > > I think this topic should be ready by now. The last iteration only added > another test that catches a bug we recently started to hit in production > systems, and the previous iterations all received reviews. > > I can try to loop in another set of reviewers though if you prefer. For a topic like this with multiple iterations, I always revisit the thread overview https://lore.kernel.org/git/20260112-b4-pks-odb-read-object-info-improvements-v5-0-9a6124e95bf2@pks.im/ at lore, but it is hard to judge quickly if we have reached the point of diminishing returns when the last few rounds got almost no responses. > I also noticed that the patch series at [1] is not in "seen" yet. Is > that intentional or merely an oversight? > > Thanks! > > Patrick > > [1]: <20260105-pks-geometric-repack-with-promisors-v1-0-c4660573437e@pks.im> It was more like "this topic saw a few responses, one saying the thing is confusing, another saying the series is good up to one point without mentioning anything about the later steps. perhaps it is time to see an updated series, in which case my time is better spent on other topics first". Will take a look at them later today. Thanks for pinging.