From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] apply: refactor `struct image` to use a `struct strbuf`
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:30:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8qvrmm5e.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cf45daf84af68f74d87a5b2ae7102d4cd8ceb57.1726470385.git.ps@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:10:16 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> Refactor the code to use a `struct strbuf` instead, addressing all of
> the above. Like this we can easily perform in-place updates in all
> situations, the logic to perform those updates becomes way simpler and
> the lifetime of the buffer becomes a ton easier to track.
>
> This refactoring also plugs some leaking buffers as a side effect.
Nice.
In short, the leaks were in the original code where it was making
direct assignment to image->buf, and we now use strbuf_attach(),
which releases the current buffer before replacing it with a piece
of memory allocated outside the control of strbuf API?
> static void image_remove_last_line(struct image *img)
> {
> - img->len -= img->line[--img->line_nr].len;
> + strbuf_setlen(&img->buf, img->buf.len - img->line[--img->line_nr].len);
> }
I feel that this, while technically is faithful to the original, got
a bit too complex to understand what is going on. Perhaps split it
into two statements with an intermediate variable? I dunno.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-16 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 7:09 [PATCH 0/6] apply: fix leaking buffer of `struct image` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] apply: reorder functions to move image-related things together Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] apply: rename functions operating on `struct image` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] apply: introduce macro and function to init images Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] apply: refactor code to drop `line_allocated` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-17 9:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 21:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] apply: rename members that track line count and allocation length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 7:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] apply: refactor `struct image` to use a `struct strbuf` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-16 19:30 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-09-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] apply: fix leaking buffer of `struct image` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] apply: reorder functions to move image-related things together Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] apply: rename functions operating on `struct image` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] apply: introduce macro and function to init images Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] apply: refactor code to drop `line_allocated` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] apply: rename members that track line count and allocation length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] apply: refactor `struct image` to use a `struct strbuf` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] apply: fix leaking buffer of `struct image` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-09-17 20:57 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq8qvrmm5e.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).