git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] push: don't fetch commit object when checking existence
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:16:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8r014pyn.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240522133621.1308393-1-tom@compton.nu> (Tom Hughes's message of "Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:21 +0100")

Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu> writes:

> If we're checking to see whether to tell the user to do a fetch
> before pushing there's no need for us to actually fetch the object
> from the remote if the clone is partial.
>
> Because the promisor doesn't do negotiation actually trying to do
> the fetch of the new head can be very expensive as it will try and
> include history that we already have and it just results in rejecting
> the push with a different message, and in behavior that is different
> to a clone that is not partial.

Interesting.  Is this something that is easily testable, perhaps by
preparing a partial clone and try to push from there and checking
the non-existence of the object after seeing that push failed?

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu>
> ---
>  remote.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 2b650b813b..20395bbbd0 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
>  		if (!reject_reason && !ref->deletion && !is_null_oid(&ref->old_oid)) {
>  			if (starts_with(ref->name, "refs/tags/"))
>  				reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS;
> -			else if (!repo_has_object_file(the_repository, &ref->old_oid))
> +			else if (!repo_has_object_file_with_flags(the_repository, &ref->old_oid, OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT))
>  				reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST;
>  			else if (!lookup_commit_reference_gently(the_repository, &ref->old_oid, 1) ||
>  				 !lookup_commit_reference_gently(the_repository, &ref->new_oid, 1))

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-22 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-22 13:36 [PATCH] push: don't fetch commit object when checking existence Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-22 20:15   ` [PATCH v2] " Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 20:55     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 21:46       ` Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 21:58         ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23  8:58     ` Jeff King
2024-05-22 20:18   ` [PATCH] " Tom Hughes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq8r014pyn.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom@compton.nu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).