From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] push: don't fetch commit object when checking existence
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 12:16:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq8r014pyn.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240522133621.1308393-1-tom@compton.nu> (Tom Hughes's message of "Wed, 22 May 2024 14:36:21 +0100")
Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu> writes:
> If we're checking to see whether to tell the user to do a fetch
> before pushing there's no need for us to actually fetch the object
> from the remote if the clone is partial.
>
> Because the promisor doesn't do negotiation actually trying to do
> the fetch of the new head can be very expensive as it will try and
> include history that we already have and it just results in rejecting
> the push with a different message, and in behavior that is different
> to a clone that is not partial.
Interesting. Is this something that is easily testable, perhaps by
preparing a partial clone and try to push from there and checking
the non-existence of the object after seeing that push failed?
Thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Tom Hughes <tom@compton.nu>
> ---
> remote.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
> index 2b650b813b..20395bbbd0 100644
> --- a/remote.c
> +++ b/remote.c
> @@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ void set_ref_status_for_push(struct ref *remote_refs, int send_mirror,
> if (!reject_reason && !ref->deletion && !is_null_oid(&ref->old_oid)) {
> if (starts_with(ref->name, "refs/tags/"))
> reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS;
> - else if (!repo_has_object_file(the_repository, &ref->old_oid))
> + else if (!repo_has_object_file_with_flags(the_repository, &ref->old_oid, OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT))
> reject_reason = REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST;
> else if (!lookup_commit_reference_gently(the_repository, &ref->old_oid, 1) ||
> !lookup_commit_reference_gently(the_repository, &ref->new_oid, 1))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 13:36 [PATCH] push: don't fetch commit object when checking existence Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-05-22 20:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 21:46 ` Tom Hughes
2024-05-22 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 8:58 ` Jeff King
2024-05-22 20:18 ` [PATCH] " Tom Hughes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq8r014pyn.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@compton.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).