From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2CAC433EF for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0085363429 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239134AbhKOR5e (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:57:34 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:50960 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239245AbhKOR4S (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:56:18 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C7E156B88; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:53:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=B3uEDNw1U9kO Rhtkdteqj+/oNr+rk4j5m6VvMRvMLyo=; b=oEiaMgf3iWckH93afQLXNDanccs9 RxkoC+6gxu/PGl6hF9kj6Mpk0Z0UTnIEmxclZIj1PaYJFmpMhQs1CpDBxz3rRLPG 1BbJv/wFxvtxQRsgA0StpTgKxBWJpGwCAaCeNdx/zjlxZnxBASnDTBngIaB8p3qk wd6l85QIB9IwF+8= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFAB156B87; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:53:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D063156B85; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 12:53:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Fabian Stelzer , git@vger.kernel.org, Adam Dinwoodie , Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test-lib: show missing prereq summary References: <20211115160750.1208940-1-fs@gigacodes.de> <20211115160750.1208940-2-fs@gigacodes.de> <211115.865ysts45o.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:53:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: <211115.865ysts45o.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?= =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Mon, 15 Nov 2021 18:44:14 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E6183F42-463C-11EC-8A04-F327CE9DA9D6-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: >> +if test -n "$missing_prereq" >> +then >> + unique_missing_prereq=3D$( >> + echo $missing_prereq | >> + tr -s "," "\n" | >> + grep -v '^$' | >> + sort -u | >> + paste -s -d ',') > > What is paste? Some out-of-tree debugging utility? https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/paste.html Don't feel bad for not knowing it. I usually do not use cut or paste myself and I had to look it up the other day while reviewing the RFC phase of this series. I am not sure '\n' is a good idea from portability perspective. I thought I wrote '\012' in the illustration in my review?