From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FC8C2D0EC for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D0E20730 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 22:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ntP7q7Ig" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726407AbgDGWVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:21:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:54186 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726393AbgDGWVE (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:21:04 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F26AF9E4; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Bkfrei75s5AmpJCK5mFxYIZehFw=; b=ntP7q7 IgtHnsIvE/tgPuwDkZo2YSpnOHlqgNyjLtswZn4XrfqriI1QRUUYFXV2ZOGqdjAv yM4B8cIO/o6G6zAgVMaGwKNOBlKy9TYUsGZeKysC7W3J/Bl0Tk6FMTya0v+Dfapz SvyB3p3JKMNugITcsXOpAgeX/Wsh8CyTT4b2g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=m5X0vHArCQwfioe2HrUdd0OPajASCpDP tkBo1C+ic93uun+wYYbe99xJBByrR5Lrmvrc050kDfxji+3s9d3QkpcAKQ4J8dig QuXOtPvYYCOl8K2pjKPsfWPvZ62Fwtdz7RDXThXpH9WQkOu431xk984V55lDj/zG ckKTXuOiznI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC78AF9E3; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:21:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D97C5AF9DF; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:20:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Emma Brooks , git@vger.kernel.org, Denton Liu , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [PATCH] format-patch: teach --no-encode-headers References: <20200405231109.8249-1-me@pluvano.com> <20200407034622.GA42812@pluvano.com> <20200407203111.GA1936475@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 15:20:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200407203111.GA1936475@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 7 Apr 2020 16:31:11 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0F30E480-791E-11EA-80E5-8D86F504CC47-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > Saying "--no-rfc2047-encoding" would be more descriptive to _me_, but I > wonder if people not so familiar with the standards would find it a bit > obscure. Another option is to invert it to "--8bit-email-headers" or > something. Yup, having "rfc2047" in the name of the option was one of the things I considered suggesting, but I didn't for the same reason. I am OK with "--[no-]8bit-email-headers" (when --8bit, rfc2047 is skipped). Or "--[no-]email-header-encoding". Thanks.