From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611041F4C0 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730444AbfJ2CFO (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:05:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56231 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726526AbfJ2CFO (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:05:14 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8372D24C; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:05:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nJD18Y2ZUncYRyp0/WiwkJZUabA=; b=uWnQh8 ObprVCykhFLN2DqwG4eeUaU9gpGHvgwCaiuuGFCCxo4QpavWzwo2joszJlcl8n+9 Qq9Rkgqg+uuRPmUCJI9BkgY8bTWTQDPagI73+B2xCbMRA6p1VkoMZBF9SLcOZIJY 2ArdgeEhJBFtBcqopRteA+a9rLw87bhgTBu7Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=kqzK7a7smKCd6MURn1HkhBhMtSYL7tVC G5gUxUSVYwZtgaDtS3pf/Ln8956WQdUJRibDRJxhcinS/3FadROcqXsZIAGLe/I6 KnrKh9teyrjUbhO8ZkLFXrSD3kdH1GH7K5Ort2Vd7xUHHoXUsryAmbmjddZu7yAj oZpuIeczuK0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1318F2D24B; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:05:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B4D22D246; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 22:05:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Rohit Ashiwal Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] commit: fix advice for empty commits during rebases References: Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:05:10 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:11:13 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8A0E8F70-F9F0-11E9-A0F3-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > As the bug was introduced in this cycle, I would like to see the bug fix > in v2.24.0, though;... Do you mean that before the change you blame for the "bug" things worked better than what we have at the tip of 'master', or do you mean that the change you blame for the "bug" changed the behaviour relative to the previous released version but the updated behavior is not what you consider correct?