From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91D21F89C for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 18:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752909AbdARSg6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:36:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54121 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752519AbdARSg4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:36:56 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DD65F961; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:32:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=3ygCJ4uVgH1D2wxTf784RXlnKXk=; b=XMEDKy h8J3vllBj/G18rjy42MVE3FVccqMZMG/6F9FavF+CDG05Pze6fA79KpM1kAfuxqX aqCxqlwJ5GXKvjVOl3qPkThp9vN5EfsjwB2M6bpkhZy+oZPwuRRSlWqzQ0idphNo wV5+gfivyKZcC0lO1vffJGaqorQNhx8yQ/T8E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VYbEC4tFOFu5o+NHbEdmAxTP+EirneJT 9zmHE0gXsQsOKMFPqUnjC3Ptu1NIHCOgeC/j930yeubiajapri8mmm4pGszAT4qO kYBcUVo88rAAqqZJepS8n11xPbK3r/lT6lwjA8T48SOzdu2C7g5xcizLUsbJt7nD uTBibokarLI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C5C5F960; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:32:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 563AA5F95B; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:32:45 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Michael Gooch , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: problem with insider build for windows and git References: <1bddbd50-86ea-6c38-6ab8-08336de2ba72@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:32:44 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:41:42 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 813C2604-DDAC-11E6-8259-FE3F13518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > And just to prove me wrong, today I got the first update to `maint` in six > weeks, with a message "Almost ready for 2.11.1" at its tip, featuring a > whopping 141 commits (95 of which are not merge commits). > > So it seems that v2.11.1 may happen soon, after all. Sorry for being late. I had a short travel around the year boundary, got sick and have been slow. Aside from the "ouch, one topic has merged earlier iteration, that was merged to 'master', also now merged to 'maint', and we need to follow up on both" you sent out earlier, are there any other topic that are already in 'master' that should go to 2.11.x track? Thanks.