From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5814E378D for ; Tue, 12 May 2026 06:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778567202; cv=none; b=svF/c8aODNW9283rHYskcaJd0lphVxflAEMpi0dhtOMoFUkMTPkx6whUmTMWAmQCc+My74kjwvG5uc8Yrl4dJ+A+uaa9C42vWCtKdgTNRZFg3o+WNRWgPHIlQRd4ZMo2xusKm3GRC+YtG3OtlFk0duUz0uKOGQqs6HuLKSsJcjY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778567202; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xK1kwNSimkLUPSn5inJnQDH1vk7/1oMZEr5q/NghHx8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YoeoeUiCjlvRh89WJhq8hM07WOErcqNPOC6j7o5J5t7uTM3D82309U6M/P4n1FH9idHpgcsh2l4Cnxg/44+agfqpe/nVSP8xsdxKo4qs9GejUAuwBFqva0yv1kMSbNVk9bzQAZbOXdhoydgZnSzM8oflwjTPTGVG8kWJ/ql54aY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=BP2D6PeG; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=SK8pLrN1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="BP2D6PeG"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="SK8pLrN1" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B73EC01D4; Tue, 12 May 2026 02:26:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 May 2026 02:26:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1778567187; x=1778653587; bh=GVWSamrWtUG90sBF9nej1EMWGfk5WgQ3w5xWBPyKr60=; b= BP2D6PeGH22TujHvd+SlV64Hdq2H0rGBrqHGGXekD8jun8PQmL6A5lAWLbafQwxP iHMwIY4hF2MhB0LOnFJa9PHwn7EVzsEfQRKpsZ5H9TElNcsPHNVQWqP2cmfRzRoJ NOF2AGJmOBcV/WPH1JtmBWPXo//HgEY8qq+LwfMGFEC6jR5cr04D+1VwhmFKRKnc JzulbEfkwyImhESMTWp3Un6DZQyUlsG8OQfdHXXwK5PXPMNWyOtcTNbeP/28EqEx yy7DTbkQzxWcDl9DHuTeHvGrEU9+/+r3onlLuvx8pLOmaXKPym91c02d3xROA6/I SToAw0TiGbxiis9hq0aWTg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1778567187; x= 1778653587; bh=GVWSamrWtUG90sBF9nej1EMWGfk5WgQ3w5xWBPyKr60=; b=S K8pLrN1gWg9+O+aORZGPg7VXysN0hT+teu2fWXTQUNwL5jnKK7ZuZCVWHxG6jlvT Bmx0v+yHNToIGO+wE2zYsJjmzUVUpj2HQnuZCEYbrXONIMpiP+wRnT5Sv+2+vqys cx5Yt9QubAAiZsrYCkVMk4U+mxuBI+oIbldAzQoh9+njo8YKlpFIynCQ2ya3QdIu 5NfsRBsL4AwhbDmmxcdrJQKSCoiKqaDQWAhbSZ2OGuFCs0l5mCIHfxVp+ZlYPfhU OtlgSq/bsrg+5iC8xHqYENmCKyUyJS4dUBZu3VeDIR0mIsAZR/xMBxi0E5i8wEBi iKjE8aqCA0KRIt7E6w+fQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdduvddutdekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtkeertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihho ucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedtffdvteegvddtkeetfeevueevlefgkeefheeigfehveehvdekheelveev fedtheenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeelpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegsvghnrdhknhhosghlvgesghhmrghilhdrtghomh dprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkh hsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehprghulhesphgruhhlthgrrhhjrghnrdgtohhmpdhrtghp thhtohepshiivgguvghrrdguvghvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfh hfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhthhhusgesphgruhhlihhsrghgvggv khdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 May 2026 02:26:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ben Knoble Cc: Paul Tarjan via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Paul Tarjan , =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= SZEDER , Jeff King , Paul Tarjan Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 00/13] fsmonitor: implement filesystem change listener for Linux In-Reply-To: <487628C4-596C-4870-A652-E1670C700AD7@gmail.com> (Ben Knoble's message of "Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:50:19 -0400") References: <487628C4-596C-4870-A652-E1670C700AD7@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 15:26:25 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ben Knoble writes: >> Le 15 avr. 2026 à 09:27, Paul Tarjan via GitGitGadget a écrit : >> >> This series implements the built-in fsmonitor daemon for Linux using the >> inotify API, bringing it to feature parity with the existing Windows and >> macOS implementations. It also fixes two memory leaks in the >> platform-independent daemon code and deduplicates the IPC and settings logic >> that is now shared between macOS and Linux. > > Troubleshooting a Gentoo build failure of next has me pretty > convinced this topic is in there already. Junio should probably > check my math, but I think that means we want to see fixes on top > of that base now (unless we are reverting this topic from next and > queuing a new version?). > > (The failure is a Gentoo-ism; we carry a patch that stops applying > with this series. Not anything this project needs to worry about.) So is there a verdict already, which this project may not need to worry about? This has been kept out of 'next' after getting reverted but if the breakage was due to Gentoo-ism whose workaround does not need to get upstreamed, and if there are no other reasons to block the topic, I am inclined to mark the topic for 'next'. Thanks.