From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca>
Cc: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>,
"Julia Evans" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] doc: add an explanation of Git's data model
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:16:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa50rqcy1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2474339d-67bc-4a68-9f26-fe7edd172ec4@app.fastmail.com> (Julia Evans's message of "Tue, 11 Nov 2025 10:24:38 -0500")
"Julia Evans" <julia@jvns.ca> writes:
>> Maybe its just me, but I find it a quite roundabout thing to say
>> that a ref refers to an object name (or "ID" if you like), simply
>> because name or ID *is* a way to refer to the thing that is assigned
>> that name, so you are making a ref to refer to something ("name")
>> that refers to what it ("ref") originally wanted to refer to
>> ("object").
> ...
> One idea I just had is "a branch is a label for a commit ID", which
> I think avoids the issue with "name" from earlier.
>
>> That is what I find the most strange in the construction "A branch
>> refers to ID" at the conceptual level. I am much less unhappy with
>> "A branch records an ID", but stopping at that may make readers ask
>> the obvious question "what goal does that design aim to achieve?"
>> (whose answer is of course "to refer to the object that is assigned
>> that ID").
>>
>> "A branch refers to a commit object by recording its object name",
>> "A branch records the ID of a commit it refers to", "A branch
>> records the ID of the commit at the tip of its history". Any of the
>> phrasing that does not make "ID" the object/target of the verb
>> "refer to" would work to avoid that strange construction.
Sorry, but I am having a hard time to come up with something that I
can give to help somebody who rejects "record", saying that it is a
new verb, and in the same message introduces "label" as a better
alternative, as we haven't seen "label" used in this context,
either.
Besides, a label, a name, or an ID are all that are used to refer to
something (in this context, "a commit object"), so I find the newly
proposed one just as roundabout as "a branch refers to ID" in the
same way. The use of *ID* is a low-level implementation detail to
make the ref work as a label for, or make the ref refer to, an
object, so "is a label for ID" is just as bad as "refers to ID".
If we do not hesitate using a new word and introduce "label", "a
branch works as a label for a commit object" may probably work,
probably.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-03 17:34 [PATCH] doc: add a explanation of Git's data model Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-10-03 21:46 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-06 19:36 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-06 21:44 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-06 21:46 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-06 21:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-09 13:20 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-08 9:59 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-06 3:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-06 19:03 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-07 12:37 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-07 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-07 14:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-07 17:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-07 19:30 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-07 20:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-07 18:39 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-07 18:55 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-08 4:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-08 15:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-08 19:06 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-10-10 11:51 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-13 14:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-14 5:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-14 9:18 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-14 11:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-14 13:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3] " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-10-15 6:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-15 15:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-15 17:20 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-15 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-16 14:21 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-15 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-16 15:19 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-16 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-16 18:59 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-16 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-16 15:24 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-20 16:37 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-20 18:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-27 19:32 ` [PATCH v4] doc: add an " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-10-27 21:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-28 20:10 ` Julia Evans
2025-10-28 20:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v5] " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-10-31 14:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 7:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 15:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 19:43 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-04 1:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-04 15:45 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-04 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-04 21:24 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-04 23:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-05 0:02 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-05 3:21 ` Ben Knoble
2025-11-05 16:26 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-06 3:07 ` Ben Knoble
2025-10-31 21:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 7:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 19:52 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-07 19:52 ` [PATCH v6] " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-11-07 21:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 21:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 21:40 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-07 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-08 19:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-09 0:48 ` Ben Knoble
2025-11-09 4:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-10 15:56 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-11 10:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-11 13:07 ` Ben Knoble
2025-11-11 15:24 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-12 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-11-12 22:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-13 19:50 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-13 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-13 20:18 ` Julia Evans
2025-11-13 20:34 ` Chris Torek
2025-11-13 23:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-12 19:53 ` [PATCH v7] " Julia Evans via GitGitGadget
2025-11-12 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-23 2:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-12-01 8:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-02 12:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-09 14:20 ` [PATCH] doc: add a " Julia Evans
2025-10-10 0:42 ` Ben Knoble
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa50rqcy1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=julia@jvns.ca \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).