From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A04288D2 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 2025 00:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760228138; cv=none; b=Q4JiD4z1iFpk6yMeazioZgbpacXyQwnv6pYxflgDaJA0WxI244cPx0D4PABmeyf/uCU8VrOEEVHxAdPP3IAggzp6r74eJss6yzRA/NvAYQRWi48XRRQfpnN8GjxA/xY/eKX6yksMpNlMKZ5h9+EuynrHtmcbVfC21tec9Pro5R8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760228138; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mwx8NJNwSnGHvod545KEenMfjtJgFPrL2wDEHr9T5uo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iWAzuwUA5rHeQd6kUv9qWcBH0e8cOP6WMMjIfOKQuuSsNtz+7P5WMsvnHXjMXANERgHjHY1FT/cYBfB3XtLFpqFDuRwZhQtH/X+AQg6bsd3DGh2QICs6w6nsBsDSBj6qrZR+kMmY+LQovdi3+bY7YQ8CvnmesusXgUe+O2nA68E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=aT0b00Xe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ocPL3jJu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="aT0b00Xe"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ocPL3jJu" Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783331400068; Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:15:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:15:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760228135; x=1760314535; bh=9F8f2MwtmG 16eJ+fwg1b8jep9kt58WRk84mdw2ZbgMM=; b=aT0b00Xeke+yH4zK4GPfE30AMr ABVNpu5CMqkXghNOOXdzw/8s1kIEIf9XEjKHJZ6TWECDnNzVHiXdX6n1sGe47JG1 jQHAspo+CzE/TIbxm08mt402BKnVgOzBE26AYcCKZkQBrzuu8XMht/c8TQnX9grl rrNHlUmhwJZhm4UnsIMbICTgFHiucm0Njo8g4YccUH4ZufmdQFoMvDi7ShBbF4bf CGwwOYoiHrXuwnS2QtYHRB1R7d9trXNPMkvPnTA+/3i5fNl8+PD8w6iaerSBoVB9 P9XIBhZLXHP7tRYAG1/pz6xY3TJb5SZW2MuK1ZGYUyhozLYGITKIq3OC633Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1760228135; x=1760314535; bh=9F8f2MwtmG16eJ+fwg1b8jep9kt58WRk84m dw2ZbgMM=; b=ocPL3jJuyRBvZWaESmDjv/jeXWpp7wz0eBWHzxOmYt3SKAQ9n76 ZpcPBLoI+CZATCSnXQl/UgY4AQTo5RpAm7K37wW/4SfEAp+XA0ybKP8IFpcGh72z m7YWJZSDODOfjW4RcPBUWiXMIy5O0Di1IxpYmQMvmbMX1yCt+3XmGQVL514e5SXJ DMaVC77tTvdA1vfsqW+ZY35nqXk7YTeHRGnqRTlue3eb6etaRmI4KA0KS/quGMWI VJNM/D2oZi2eoDwCA0Xd2M+GJMzsQG6oeFxBx8xsg2NVk67moLCtZoePUYtDbWwC vRMSnObcjuFKJ6VuaLIHiUDdwqvTij9Cf3A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdduudeffeduucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepuddupdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehtmhiisehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhes ghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorh hgpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgv fhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehsrghnuggrlhhssegtrhhushhthihtoh hothhhphgrshhtvgdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehjohhhrghnnhgvshdrshgthhhinhgu vghlihhnsehgmhigrdguvgdprhgtphhtthhopegtohhllhhinhdrfhhunhhkudesghhmrg hilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 11 Oct 2025 20:15:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Todd Zullinger Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , Christian Couder , git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren , Jeff King , "brian m . carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Collin Funk , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] lib-gpg: allow tests with GPGSM or GPGSSH prereq first In-Reply-To: (Todd Zullinger's message of "Fri, 10 Oct 2025 22:14:20 -0400") References: <20251007122958.1089680-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20251009122457.1273701-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20251009122457.1273701-3-christian.couder@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 17:15:33 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Todd Zullinger writes: > In my recollection, they fail all (or nearly all?) of the > time in our CI runs and when I was building git for Fedora > infrastructure, they failed consistently on the Fedora > builders as well. > > They fail rarely (if ever) when I run them locally, even > with --stress options. That made it rather difficult to > work out the issue. I thought that it was a timing problem > for a while, but I wasn't able to find a way to demonstrate > that. > > Thanks for the willingness to suffer some test breakage to > see if it can flush out a fix. :) Or I can just revert these two patches if nothing happens ;-). > I suspect there are folks here who know the test suite and > code being tested well enough that it may be really obvious > to them. Whether there is an intersection of those folks > and spare "round tuits" is another matter.