From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A42529ACC3 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 15:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749743307; cv=none; b=Q5ekAz6ilPWl1qKXhpnHlswNqLIuQOHcy7H1gq685Yt6XigAM7DgAfVupmqN9WUrl/k/NxZu+3VJ8OER1hT6abTRgPymeUqyLmNjtROW0FwTxI2qdVx3OwVE+6dU+YvLYvNOXYlTIDWh/CVSoRxunbg+OaCakalUtUs4u6uZOgg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749743307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=21FiZm7cEJ+6YNlcVn813xp8PRqtXdXropH1tfSk4c8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hieiK6Hl1H65Nc0urkk9Hhvxts2mckVfYmYa3JXCXDfhr0EEttypnabM6ZJzyju08+1MWFe7SaseL/LYA/w2qv0AnUtDeeEzPjTLAxxRWVyfWDuljHIextA9YWxeDc+Iglyp96fdr/P/soXj+lUue2Y+sBbEjipM/ZMIYCHeHYo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=fezOgt0a; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=fEoqh794; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="fezOgt0a"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="fEoqh794" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F901140227; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:48:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:48:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1749743304; x=1749829704; bh=abBStaf9CJ jlbekhkxHnl0/wbG9Do4PjGhg//yWkPdQ=; b=fezOgt0abdZfOYfvnjnZUfe8kx fvyAzMcdB1Y5CcSHfJ9M969hYteIAZnDLaDs9yeczryL9RTixOuSEvzs5wd2+KZk 13sci7o+qn0tzhjnXK3yEklRc8s5C7YanZbs0wmd3pfZjVZFABdc8QUFxwzl9eXh S3BAk4dN2znqfyFRYg1f+uH46PAyhT0TAirUdnVtfDvGZOlnsyJN8q/+0zXDg9Ar /nWvI/LiDaxSAcpNI7J4IXuW/HN0R7AYg2CtfD1aNtx6PnhabBgibOd2MTD1yyWQ OCAz+s7QAHZtEm/Do4vBzM5iMvTNOwjmm2sVkSMM1yYSpH9WyHCWXwn33SXw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1749743304; x=1749829704; bh=abBStaf9CJjlbekhkxHnl0/wbG9Do4PjGhg //yWkPdQ=; b=fEoqh794gGrcsHzp7LVrYGN9EZcjobQz7EH2fTBuoqTuH9ETKT+ E2Yve9lILCxz1dOklVkQV3Bz5Ejlxkha/ZplK4gwgnTOopFu6PGyH9wuDtf3GEZw fqCrblJrSF4TjGl3E8byY92smXc/eCo1sWarBnZxUYaC/4zyn5DqlHOuyoG6XTxu sdR0lHcuIsrJogGGzjvLU74lFtiREfB1IobsjTNinHlwUWL7utIbNRR1euPO0VHa 8DaJr74Cy2LBNWhggKzuzfa+mVjsB3ESVaq8bezAsbKe1vHiPljEaV6U7xrbZoQ6 M2MLDY73kDpxRsPaeoK1u+YA7ZctGlrpnow== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddugdduheegjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivg hnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredt necuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsoh igrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueef jeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgt phhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvrghsth grtggthhhiohhtthhisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhgihhtghgr ughgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnh gvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 12 Jun 2025 11:48:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Andrea Stacchiotti Cc: Andrea Stacchiotti via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] branch: move multiple branches in a single --force In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 12 Jun 2025 02:55:31 -0700") References: Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:48:22 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Junio C Hamano writes: > I may change my mind. But I do not think the feature should not be > tied to "--force" option at all. Sorry for a double-negation failure. What I think is that the feature should be orthogonal to "--force".