From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720762192F6 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740415594; cv=none; b=t6leniz73gtHtPN3VId8lEL1GH7sEGUEA6z2BqD0LUGi8HW4xKSGIOiek21PN7oHMXGbOE6l2aXDFTlKmQBv3O/7iLAauIbZ7O1Q8kBindP2r6I1d7wc9bqy1N4JVppECSWZ+7lNVdlUh9JGXWjJDcpkBhXq9Tr2CL4o0kuqdLI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740415594; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yRmxRTXO0kr0yBw//Khev7qvzu/Qb2jSFT3uYx6th38=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=I7YiqFzsCaJaL4x0fWcnUOUTx4qaEPlo0+jKyqkx4Nq/jb/Pk4Os2Lk44SgdILvknlQKCfPuyqFb3Wb+/rgn24/zlGQjcHmk6HQUaxvdyWm5oWC0nQKrbMcRdrLqHbbUJ7GDfUffax8mMNZarWkeCrSBqPymdUhPNDdLj0uph/A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=ppO9afRw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=JoACbOPN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="ppO9afRw"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="JoACbOPN" Received: from phl-compute-09.internal (phl-compute-09.phl.internal [10.202.2.49]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E45B11401FB; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-09.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1740415591; x=1740501991; bh=BSATK+yACg qA9pMzlMHHGEiVJI4GyAs7FC8Icwrtb8k=; b=ppO9afRwNE4YUA6p33TGf9QGI5 68RbpaAzRJ9jcLS5sJ4St1qbf84llFW4hEs6zShb40UDLKURUHuMQ2CI0t6c65bX NVs/e8oDpylWypVmVgr8u9cSa7tAVZBeSmVRYGawc/mhpYee6Px5KboU7QlA3Sw+ muIHfJ8KxmFkph28cI/UIUx2c+xWFJMiuqi+UrXKCu4BO85MTTwV0Y7kDH9m0z3Z 6RcNexwbGiwOFzwXOFLsrmk6btlkxagYm4SMKFyUCWXHi17ssIr8B/P/tQR1JiiG EL2JlAfv8JUTb7Y2B9WOg4wfUTadm2CZd85xvp+f8632f1/VsHOnwKr6R9PQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1740415591; x=1740501991; bh=BSATK+yACgqA9pMzlMHHGEiVJI4GyAs7FC8 Icwrtb8k=; b=JoACbOPN4Fp9OrhLYx/+4coUcUIIlhVp31D6x+WrIwbyMR9DNII FVXbUjEccsbdI7/3WGnVTJRsqEd8sJgJMh6c76uTBLuKD+Yc4rxkUgu6/VXb0NJT 9yi1iAHzeJ4ahi6GOLhESyKrn8F+lyqPN24OP1+e9ZOZC3JDCD7jRB74eh6zG6wF 2+gHM9JRvroAD8Nuxc9+jfL/sfxl4JZdas42kmd3Q0Buz1wwvbNMy2RO7pMTpSQ1 2b5vqIkQN4dtAK+tPzj2HJhdAelW5al5IQAld0Q3YO3IGOsAkG4+6502V9vd51sP eG16exYunJZPO3MBL+CB+i9sAgkandluHqA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdejleeftdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdp uffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvve fujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgr nhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepfe evteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeeigeeinecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrh esphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhht pdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthhhprghsthgvrdhnvg htpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthho pehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:46:30 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix netrc usage with WebDAV-based HTTP protocol In-Reply-To: <20250223015331.588161-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Sun, 23 Feb 2025 01:53:30 +0000") References: <20250223015331.588161-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 08:46:29 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "brian m. carlson" writes: > However, I think we need to either decide that we're going to support > this as a fully-fledged feature and add documentation and sufficient > tests, or remove it, since it's not reasonable to have undocumented, > untested features that people rely on. Does "this" refer to "use of netrc in HTTP code paths", or "HTTP walker"? I am kind of surprised that anybody is still using the latter, regardless of where the credential is locally stored. > I will note, as an argument in favour of removal, that we have > git-credential-netrc helper in contrib that users can enable if > they want to retain this functionality, and we could even ship it > by default without much difficulty. I am fine with the approach. Thanks.