From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
"Matěj Cepl" <mcepl@cepl.eu>,
"Jonas Konrad" <jonas.konrad@uni-muenster.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git branch outputs usage message on stderr
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:16:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa5brydz1.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250115182419.GA86610@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:24:19 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> Yeah, I agree it is funny to have a "maybe noop, maybe exit" function.
> Perhaps a different name would help? I'd expect show_usage_help() to
> always do what the name says. Maybe check_help_option() or something?
maybe_show_usage_help()?
>> +void show_usage_help(int ac, const char **av,
>> + const char * const *usagestr,
>> + const struct option *opts)
>> +{
>> + if (ac == 2 && !strcmp(av[1], "-h")) {
>> + usage_with_options_internal(NULL, usagestr, opts, 0, 0);
>> + exit(0);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> I think parse-options will exit(129) in this case, and that's what t0012
> insists upon.
Yeah, but the test can be adjusted to updated reality if needed.
In this case, the command is doing what the end-user asked it to do,
and if we were writing the system from scratch, 0 would certainly be
the right exit status in this case. If hit usage_with_options()
because the command line option supplied by the user was nonsense,
we should exit with non-zero, but I am not sure if exit(129) is a
good idea here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-15 11:21 Git branch outputs usage message on stderr Jonas Konrad
2025-01-15 11:36 ` Matěj Cepl
2025-01-15 14:47 ` Jonas Konrad
2025-01-15 15:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 16:55 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-01-15 17:14 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 17:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 18:24 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-01-15 21:29 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 21:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 22:27 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 23:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-16 1:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-16 10:24 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 22:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 22:28 ` Jeff King
2025-01-15 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 18:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 18:33 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-01-15 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 17:14 ` Jonas Konrad
2025-01-15 17:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-01-15 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-01-15 17:39 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-01-15 17:47 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa5brydz1.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonas.konrad@uni-muenster.de \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=mcepl@cepl.eu \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).