From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C8FB1C32 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 14:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735567646; cv=none; b=asUN8yEGkhUfgz2KH2Yw9aSWVDRBvcz3qae59xC7IHHF24MSbDz08m61wUHZplLSe//efz3AZtKos5Dq2urZnzgGQ6wfP7kxcMW67Aj4n+/XuQsX8rvv20FzDvOK14tNVVFTfhq1Oai8mOL2jbJkTYGEb3mBM18h/tUVDJ5dkKs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735567646; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4TAYp1pqe7OTR+R5asjiS8eBcgIJcEHDZrU/3AOqiFM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OrhSx9lOACltnLRW6dXyI1Y4NJhoMFanCDgZNBsWArRsyQMV1eADup7uVBX8tk4t39lcGOi+vZhdbDVR4d+wjagThPPocRBdktFu+Sycqsx0P0DvU1sJ/wnZSr1v0ia2FS6VMXuyIYOs+XwXAKOrDeTLPjK1eCxyKuURtPRqEi0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=y8QUlYyl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=GGO7J3WT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="y8QUlYyl"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="GGO7J3WT" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B16E13807BC; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:07:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:07:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1735567643; x=1735654043; bh=7O3WWlQUx+ /ao1jmwzITA6diOi84DpvUxLWhGF9pr3E=; b=y8QUlYylRxiieS9HpJIX8du2b/ oIpPQzYo2aalKdRaZkrC9UZHvp94iHf7OsySmwnqAlVOl4hsUDkzrxBtj4sq5QFd NUKVn64XZOsYu0txMG5SEOLk8ASPP63D5OPHCpWElwOWsk6CGRTRnPybBEryHFed XPcGJqN+nyM4qJTcK4t22RKfZuQPAmvwLEThdXKs6zd3Bn1NmMwbRJs74Z4yrYKV 4+y7C55yrEjH3+H2KaPdvK3d46h5rrGOo9AlzBayfgg6MVehNvxT19HTe5IltGVK w+mLXUEytWlKzLhusrFHAphJ1PnZeZ41aj0omJARtOKh6mKkN8am0v8kzSpA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1735567643; x=1735654043; bh=7O3WWlQUx+/ao1jmwzITA6diOi84DpvUxLW hGF9pr3E=; b=GGO7J3WT4d5MJOr6LioumbE7HpbPb2g3dP50o1++B26yd7160bM Ig4nBQEmTXN+/wbwBGyN66UY5+yu0VJ1N+0LFiJt+PzHBQ3jgmW+HuEAATzcEaky ET7i179c5RQAchdaiBh4gHfAyuFuMrxLh+ryfLRFfJ4N82w6Dtjz9vpcZx2TcixE 5I5q17hFUFXIskdkYTbjcddGkSFBudOlPfgOfWtUFfuvYKFLam7DwKLt7/CCr8qb v/dxjPmxUD9jr4b0uHWQEQ+jPQvwJfi5ry0XNlyYioaoaLMoXTN2Vz4OkkTsPf1F w+BS4vrveYxm9+cDWAAz4HnrjpBnHpM7Wvw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefuddruddviedgieduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertden ucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogi drtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueehveetgffhkeeftddtgefhueekvdehgeek ueejffdttdefueelheeuheduudfgnecuffhomhgrihhnpehthhgvnhdrshhknecuvehluh hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhes phhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpd hrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgv rhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:07:23 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2024, #10; Sat, 28) In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 30 Dec 2024 08:27:48 +0100") References: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 06:07:21 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: > On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 02:23:56PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ps/more-sign-compare (2024-12-27) 10 commits > ... > There wasn't anything yet that needs addressing, unless I have missed > something. Peff acked a couple of patches, and the questions from Jialuo > have been addressed. So no rerolled is planney (yet). OK. Let's merge and cook in 'next' then. >> * sk/maintenance-remote-prune (2024-12-28) 1 commit >> - maintenance: add prune-remote-refs task >> >> A new periodic maintenance task to run "git remote prune" has been >> introduced. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: > > I've had another look at this series just now. Thanks for a review. Let's wait for a review response and go from there. >> -------------------------------------------------- >> [Cooking] >> >> * rs/reftable-realloc-errors (2024-12-28) 4 commits >> - t-reftable-merged: handle realloc errors >> - reftable: handle realloc error in parse_names() >> - reftable: fix allocation count on realloc error >> - reftable: avoid leaks on realloc error >> >> The custom allocator code in the reftable library did not handle >> failing realloc() very well, which has been addressed. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: > > I'm not a 100% happy with the split for reallocators that this series > introduces, but don't think that the series is to blame because it > simply fixes the underlying problem. So this is a good first iteration > and we can improve the status quo in a follow-up. > > So yes, I think this can be merged. OK. Again, thanks for a review.