From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95644210EC for ; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 16:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726678149; cv=none; b=KMrXklStx4GGghuvE3daTyrJUUq5ri0G2p+uabbFq+Um0zJ4oR5i3CZRdamSn5gMV7j8N4yxw6VwB8jqRcdqS69u9E880Q14SLR6numWlQY8EzsLcF3hq/yeR5I7qxn3LBsfT2ejwcbn71CjU0CzsQzr3vwDQO8y4NfwdLbL9nY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726678149; c=relaxed/simple; bh=93MZZSrUVgJ5/1K26Pa5uhipT8g4kgScjd5mum/29VQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=u7PETJyFl41oWZS3FqTd+uFZJCgrZItyVUyOYnzrH2dIKFHqZ8K8assJ9XzKA6iooh4I1lvYcFzO8WiPMnTj+wwB4bf/XBp5WTx0fktq+Njqo3ZJ8WQ8hIfPqEmjjGPnTi/n7RFCS1iFerad0+bB+wIXev0LHF9i6s+lt0qmcyI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Vq8TFBzB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.70 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Vq8TFBzB" Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C1430355; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:49:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=93MZZSrUVgJ5/1K26Pa5uhipT8g4kgScjd5mum /29VQ=; b=Vq8TFBzBVR2etR4k/nxwUp85a0eyL0+QddnMXbU3vo3+bePyUhpTYC T3p1YxEYOHaFMlTJpOBvrPQh+V3N51s5tonmsyCBrdYIsw/CpSO8ck41pu1CVEhR w8Tgxwn9eY7z/vtjCxGSV8rlWxksYVXbtCfSjZcXLX1AazHvw77Z8= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FD530354; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:49:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.108.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5CD7230353; Wed, 18 Sep 2024 12:49:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gitster@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: shejialuo Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt , Karthik Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] add ref content check for files backend In-Reply-To: (shejialuo@gmail.com's message of "Sat, 14 Sep 2024 01:14:51 +0800") References: Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:49:02 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E9E5A23A-75DD-11EF-98C4-2BAEEB2EC81B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com shejialuo writes: > Because I add more commits, I provide the "--interdiff" here to make the > reviewer's life easier. Yeah, for the changes from the previous iteration of this series, range-diff comparison is pretty much useless. Interdiff is indeed more usable, but essentially this iteration deserves reviews with fresh sets of eyes. > However, because I have not merged the latest ci fixup, so I cannot > verify some jobs in CIs. May need the help from Junio to verify. A good way to do so is to fork a temporary branch at the tip of these 5 commits, and then either merge or cherry-pick the CI fixup. Such a temporary branch should be usable for CI testing, right? Thanks. PS. I am not feeling well today; please expect delayed and/or sparse responses.