From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565242913 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717525922; cv=none; b=uk0da06nPlozT/ezjHh2hVb477TlYk/JeNEEBCzEQmYF/5OnnmE+g1GiEX9RvoAvwSqF3TmyfjSyk6h+SazKIx6et53YWSdlKH9dfanrNMqD5Uq5Giqytq9gx0ThvpLGBf+UtHKvI3q7k+2QjzQBbGBatjK8gaVUeZ+YfLonIqQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717525922; c=relaxed/simple; bh=odW1DmHqPqU3Uit7pclcO9TnqQsooSoceqO5oRLaypE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AzEeVJzJtmvVbb5sztCl6Lr4oKLGlYin2yznlizmSWFg3AT+D8cU/msbNcBUEFAEOzTOXI0Ks/WJL5BWhg8lco4sf+BTViPwgq+Z7qoCWcojTgGKSzYI9tzbcN8aUbQPR8hItuWbxCGxWSv7duuK+GerBkBeC42zTZVteSq4DmM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=upn821j9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.108.71 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="upn821j9" Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AC43607B; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:32:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=odW1DmHqPqU3Uit7pclcO9TnqQsooSoceqO5oR LaypE=; b=upn821j9jkoh9jf2aPrXNWJTSl7EmDHyx1KDi6Gyqm/baMDkS6ocDk 3Ni9mTtuSr5blZlBj2lHwmgqAw1b7C5QznjkDxyA/Szkz1hNWg6/xkjuu66tYDhf qC1h9TRi4DR/LizQwTzDubdSwELT6Qk1Ic6BRF3NI0iN0/x4MGV9A= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B503607A; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:32:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.173.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A00536079; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 14:31:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Karthik Nayak Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2024, #01; Mon, 3) In-Reply-To: (Karthik Nayak's message of "Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:07:01 +0000") References: Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 11:31:58 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BAD598DC-22A0-11EF-A77B-6488940A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Karthik Nayak writes: > Hello Junio, > > Junio C Hamano writes: > > [snip] > >> * kn/update-ref-symref (2024-05-30) 7 commits >> - update-ref: add support for 'symref-update' command >> - reftable: pick either 'oid' or 'target' for new updates >> - update-ref: add support for 'symref-create' command >> - update-ref: add support for 'symref-delete' command >> - update-ref: add support for 'symref-verify' command >> - refs: create and use `ref_update_expects_existing_old_ref()` >> - Merge branch 'kn/ref-transaction-symref' into kn/update-ref-symref >> >> "git update-ref --stdin" learned to handle transactional updates of >> symbolic-refs. >> >> Expecting a (hopefully minor and final) reroll. >> source: <20240514124411.1037019-1-knayak@gitlab.com> > > I did send in a v3 recently: The above is the v3 on May 30th. I do not know offhand if all the review comments on the previous round have been addressed in this iteration? Perhaps this needs to be marked as "Needs review" to make sure, but I forgot to update it. Thanks.