From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Cc: "'Taylor Blau'" <me@ttaylorr.com>,
"'Randall S. Becker'" <the.n.e.key@gmail.com>,
<git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] builtin/index-pack.c: change xwrite to write_in_full to allow large sizes.
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:46:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa5nmkcuz.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <026b01da6906$4d96f530$e8c4df90$@nexbridge.com> (rsbecker@nexbridge.com's message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:51:09 -0500")
<rsbecker@nexbridge.com> writes:
>>The code above loops while input_len is non-zero, and correctly
>>decrements it by the number of bytes written by xwrite() after
>>each iteration.
>>
>>Assuming that xwrite()/write(2) works how I think it does on
>>NonStop, I'm not sure I understand why this change is necessary.
>
> NonStop has a limited SSIZE_MAX. xwrite only handles that much so
> anything beyond that gets dropped (not in the above code but in
> other builtins)
xwrite() caps a single write attempt to MAX_IO_SIZE and can return a
short-write, so anything beyound MAX_IO_SIZE will not even be sent
to the underlying write(2). There is a heuristic based on the value
of SSIZE_MAX to define MAX_IO_SIZE in <git-compat-util.h>, and if
the value given by that heuristics is too large for your platform,
you can tweak your own MAX_IO_SIZE (see the comments in that header
file).
The caller of xwrite() must be prepared to see a write return with
value less than the length it used to call the function, either
because of this MAX_IO_SIZE cut-off, or because of the underlying
write(2) returning after a short write. As long as the caller is
prepared, like Taylor pointed out, I am not sure why you'd need to
change it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 22:05 [PATCH v1 0/4] Change xwrite() to write_in_full() in builtins Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] builtin/index-pack.c: change xwrite to write_in_full to allow large sizes Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 22:38 ` Taylor Blau
2024-02-26 22:51 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-02-27 0:12 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:30 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] builtin/receive-pack.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:02 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 0:15 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] builtin/repack.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 8:20 ` Jeff King
2024-02-27 8:22 ` Jeff King
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] builtin/unpack-objects.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 0:18 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa5nmkcuz.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=the.n.e.key@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).