From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] t0080: mark as leak-free
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:15:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa5onhjm4.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4adfcba4-0f2b-44f5-a312-97f00f979435@gmail.com> ("Rubén Justo"'s message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2024 22:08:23 +0100")
Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> writes:
> This test is leak-free since it was added in e137fe3b29 (unit tests: add
> TAP unit test framework, 2023-11-09)
>
> Let's mark it as leak-free to make sure it stays that way (and to reduce
> noise when looking for other leak-free scripts after we fix some leaks).
For other tests in this series, that rationale is a very sensible
thing, but does it apply to this one?
The point of the t-basic tests is to ensure the lightweight unit
test framework that requires nothing from Git behaves (and keeps
behaving) sensibly. The point of running t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]
tests under leak sanitizer is to exercise production Git code to
catch leaks in Git code.
So it is not quite clear if we even want to run this t0080 under
leak sanitizer to begin with. t0080 is a relatively tiny test, but
do we even want to spend leak sanitizer cycles on it? I dunno.
> Signed-off-by: Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com>
> ---
> t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh b/t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh
> index 961b54b06c..6657c114a3 100755
> --- a/t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh
> +++ b/t/t0080-unit-test-output.sh
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>
> test_description='Test the output of the unit test framework'
>
> +TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
> . ./test-lib.sh
>
> test_expect_success 'TAP output from unit tests' '
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 21:04 [PATCH 0/4] mark tests as leak-free Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] t0080: mark " Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-01-29 23:20 ` Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 23:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-30 18:14 ` Rubén Justo
2024-01-30 5:53 ` Jeff King
2024-01-30 20:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] t5332: " Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] t6113: " Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] test-lib: check for TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK Rubén Justo
2024-01-29 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-30 5:54 ` [PATCH 0/4] mark tests as leak-free Jeff King
2024-01-30 16:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa5onhjm4.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjusto@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).