From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007AC63708 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 00:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229744AbiLGAfV (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 19:35:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43238 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229782AbiLGAfD (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2022 19:35:03 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E101B9C9 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 16:35:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id v13-20020a17090a6b0d00b00219c3be9830so8472246pjj.4 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:35:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=iiTCWgQ85ItxpoMV/K8vlXIgP+oGv/xvUZz9ONIGNoY=; b=P8PfEGm8zUVYWZl9c3EQmLJYNC8+bSosW4qj60VnPbiomJp3s/x6m5bMlDwSgi3xVk 2eJWvtR+MqijBt3/DCQK+3vO9hMO21HdOuPwyYaup3E2jERtsyStxPCZlHMzlt1CV4Hv eBdlzzyex08hIIWhUKtUOzQoc9JRwryxIJ+R5c6RPbIUv0CFMEMn3fagjbgAspbENLQF 3iLm8cr/ds9N+EXb3C3lWoeu27SOofhLrq4irt/9Pn/ClIzhcmTuEjVH/J3pVLWGa5NC iCrIdG2CB0OFj++xeExyNt6Y8NsVRbBfU9urXhh6wz6jOkAuV8tKNQ56Al9KmDkxnEVI /8jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=iiTCWgQ85ItxpoMV/K8vlXIgP+oGv/xvUZz9ONIGNoY=; b=T8v0uqcPqRle42DIEa+QCMRZajVmnWzq7YaaChl0P8fg+yQJDV+SQ/kZMaRL633uRQ O7gUyS4Qdt6pYubl5UcC9SZiv4WdHs3Rgqc3ukSUYENG+nJXtzmpsq93XgDfGNtIrdSx QY7qqsS2JqM/HG96IThSBp9KhQtyfcjsT8oID4lfsxd+Ve+jsBdb5jP5Zan2wb3KHsPv YPqBSxI7R/McKRgbOhezh7U7aBCKkhPWOR01x+Vb52g9UrIPxEICbjBU4oWGigCv3zXp WV7g6JVkIhvO/uNSWKQTGZfeZJcRTBxg+y3b7WiRO/kSJiUEXjjFfYaBBhmVHUEZZLQu u/VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pnYegL7SQGftl9P05UrUXcs9qSPR3MAnhLKHTYQJIRrJm+UTluJ xSpuEivcWzbSo3gt30r+Q+Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf72l5Plbut0x80SZsXMmYlTzbYzTrjuj7763e7x8O3ufk1NH06ZD/qlGXoQ3SwSzFnQu1exUg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:3d4c:b0:219:3db6:f194 with SMTP id o12-20020a17090a3d4c00b002193db6f194mr46659005pjf.27.1670373302445; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:35:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y7-20020a170902d64700b00186c54188b4sm13121013plh.240.2022.12.06.16.35.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Dec 2022 16:35:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Dominguez Subject: Re: [PATCH] ci: use actions/{upload,download}-artifact@v3 References: <2s9ppo74-r654-231r-7ss7-o08464s2so6p@tzk.qr> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 09:35:01 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2022 08:41:21 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: >> This is probably incorrect, but you wouldn't know until something failed >> in the `linux32` job. > > Yeah, that was what I was afraid to see. > >> I already have a correct fix in >> https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/pull/4112/commits/b59c1e33fa62029f8d5dca801a8afb480514140c >> and was only waiting for the patch at the root of this here mail thread to >> advance further so I could contribute that fix, along with other >> replacements for deprecated operations. > > Wonderful. > >> Maybe we can move these changes forward in a more orderly manner, with >> Oscar's patch advancing to `next` once it is done, and the other patches >> following after that? > > That was what I was planning to do anyway. Thanks. Eh, I should have made my intention clear. I'll drop this one (as I posted it primarily to fish out those who are interested in and more capable than I am at clearing the deprecation warnings from the CI), will mark Oscar's for 'next' (if I haven't done so already), wait for your updates and queue them on a topic forked from Oscar's (or on the same Oscar's topic), and cook them for the first or the second batch of the next cycle. Thanks.