From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com>
Cc: git-packagers@googlegroups.com, git@vger.kernel.org, lwn@lwn.net
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2022, #07; Tue, 29)
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:53:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqa64914jj.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129130841.82302-1-tenglong.tl@alibaba-inc.com> (Teng Long's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:08:41 +0800")
Teng Long <dyroneteng@gmail.com> writes:
>> * tl/pack-bitmap-absolute-paths (2022-11-29) 4 commits
>> - pack-bitmap.c: trace bitmap ignore logs when midx-bitmap is found
>> - pack-bitmap.c: break out of the bitmap loop early if not tracing
>> (merged to 'next' on 2022-11-14 at 34eb0ea05a)
>
> Will the two commits which merged to 'next' on 2022-11-14 at 34eb0ea05a
> be taken into 2.39.0-rc0 (or v2.39.0 is frozen already)?
2.39-rc0 was a preview of topics that were already done at that
point about a week ago. A topic that is not in -rc0 may hit the
release, but it depends on how urgent the "fix" is, I would say.
Unless there is a good reason not to, any topic should spend at
least a week to cook in 'next' before graduating, and because there
typically is about a week between -rc0 and -rc1, anything outside
'next' when -rc0 was tagged is not likely to have spent a week in
'next' when -rc1 is done.
We could graduate the early bits separately, but is it so urgent a
fix to get them in?
I spent a few dozens of minutes to re-read these two patches, and
while I do not think they are so complex and risky, I did not see
anything in them to give them such an urgency (for that matter, I
am not sure if they are even necessary, especially the one that
loses information from the logs).
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 3:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-23 7:25 [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.39.0-rc0 Junio C Hamano
2022-11-29 13:08 ` What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2022, #07; Tue, 29) Teng Long
2022-11-29 18:00 ` Taylor Blau
2022-11-30 12:41 ` Teng Long
2022-11-30 3:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-11-30 12:34 ` Teng Long
2022-11-30 16:42 ` Taylor Blau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-29 9:40 Junio C Hamano
2022-11-29 19:08 ` Glen Choo
2022-11-30 3:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-11-30 18:08 ` Glen Choo
2022-11-30 10:02 ` Phillip Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqa64914jj.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=dyroneteng@gmail.com \
--cc=git-packagers@googlegroups.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwn@lwn.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).