Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Yannik Tausch <dev@ytausch.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  dc@diogocastro.com
Subject: Re: pathspec: match and original in pathspec_item are const
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2026 11:51:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjaeb22p.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4439BA70-2C03-499D-B3CE-E43700C0A8DA@ytausch.de> (Yannik Tausch's message of "Thu, 3 Sep 2026 20:37:57 +0200")

Yannik Tausch <dev@ytausch.de> writes:

>> I just found [1], which is related to this patch series. I didn’t review the discussion in detail yet, will follow up.
>
> I read this as you came to the same conclusion as me independently discovering the same issue in July. Perfect! I hope it’s fine that I took over the fix that way.
>
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> 
>>> This unfortunately triggers
>>> 
>>> t/unit-tests/u-dir.c: In function 'test_dir__common_prefix_skips_excluded_pathspec_items':
>>> t/unit-tests/u-dir.c:53:34: error: initialization discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
>>>   53 |                         .match = "unrelated/path",
>>>      |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> 
>>> Other than that, looking good.
>> 
>> We may want a preparatory patch before this step.
>
> Thanks, I will include your preparatory patch in v3. 

The 'const' patch will be queued separately, and a synthetic base will
be prepared for your two-patch series by merging the 'const' patch on
a recent tip of master.

Unless you have other changes, there is no need for you to send a
three-patch series.  We do not need to take the 'const' patch hostage
to the 'pathspec' patch.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-03 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 13:04 [PATCH] dir: find common prefix among positive pathspecs Yannik Tausch
2026-09-02 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03  9:59   ` Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 10:02     ` [PATCH v2 0/2] dir: fix pathspec prefixes with exclusions Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 10:03       ` [PATCH v2 1/2] dir: do not apply prefix to negative pathspecs Yannik Tausch
2026-09-04  5:00         ` Elijah Newren
2026-09-04 14:21           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03 10:04       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dir: find common prefix among non-exclude pathspec items Yannik Tausch
     [not found]         ` <CY5PR17MB6144A1A7BF2E101FE26A6A85B1B62@CY5PR17MB6144.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
2026-09-03 11:49           ` Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:11         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03 18:13           ` pathspec: match and original in pathspec_item are const Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03 18:37             ` Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:51               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-09-03 18:57                 ` Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 21:05                   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03 21:13                     ` Yannik Tausch
2026-09-04  5:02         ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dir: find common prefix among non-exclude pathspec items Elijah Newren
2026-09-04 16:43           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-04 19:19             ` Elijah Newren
2026-09-05 16:14               ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-03 18:06       ` [PATCH v2 0/2] dir: fix pathspec prefixes with exclusions Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:43       ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:44         ` [PATCH v3 1/3] pathspec: match and original in pathspec_item are const Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:45         ` [PATCH v3 2/3] dir: do not apply prefix to negative pathspecs Yannik Tausch
2026-09-03 18:45         ` [PATCH v3 3/3] dir: find common prefix among non-exclude pathspec items Yannik Tausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbjaeb22p.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=dc@diogocastro.com \
    --cc=dev@ytausch.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox