From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] odb: make creation of on-disk structures pluggable
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 13:42:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjbtv5y6.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260724-pks-odb-create-on-disk-v1-5-3b3d265d979b@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Fri, 24 Jul 2026 05:48:44 +0200")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> Note that there is one exception though: the "objects" directory must
> exist in a repository regardless of which backend is in use. If it
> doesn't exist then the repository is not treated as a Git repository at
> all. Consequently, we create this directory regardless of the backend.
Very good thing to leave a note in the log message for.
Perhaps in Git 4.0 ;-)
> @@ -271,6 +289,7 @@ struct odb_source_files *odb_source_files_new(struct object_database *odb,
>
> files->base.free = odb_source_files_free;
> files->base.close = odb_source_files_close;
> + files->base.create_on_disk = odb_source_files_create_on_disk;
> files->base.prepare = odb_source_files_prepare;
> files->base.read_object_info = odb_source_files_read_object_info;
> files->base.read_object_stream = odb_source_files_read_object_stream;
If we are going to write a brand new object backing store that does
not use an on-disk filesystem (or a network filesystem, for that
matter) but still requires some sort of "initialization", for
example, an object database in the cloud that needs provisioning
before its first use, would this virtual function be the ideal place
to do so?
I wonder if we can give it a name better suited to its purpose by
moving away from the '_on_disk' suffix.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-24 3:48 [PATCH 0/5] odb: make creation of object database pluggable Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 1/5] loose: load loose object map for the correct source Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-24 17:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 2/5] setup: detangle loading of loose object maps Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-24 18:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 3/5] setup: defer object database creation Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-24 18:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 4/5] odb/source: introduce function to map source type to name Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-26 20:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-24 3:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] odb: make creation of on-disk structures pluggable Patrick Steinhardt
2026-07-26 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbjbtv5y6.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox