From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31A5355F58 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.155 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774630051; cv=none; b=kC2piu1L1ctJNh5m0k7+Itz/DI/599HAkcTt3rpyxHS08+fk2yVRMFkpnIYZjrA/nIu1fUO/QyrDfNYDjwVA9Lw/mH3mtbQ7uRMRcrgJM8sam8neujA+6Wz36QSSPsjcnEWo/6uFEcku1MWo1GV6R/bSByITonF04Gpz0l9XhA8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774630051; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FMJJvX66ORrSH/enfzzqeNv8FTojR1hhm/2Vh1i4fdk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=f4Hx9M8j2vsJYOdPSjQE0drpi6mOfnhzER6KsA6DLpXuHQY7hB0e6WiMWDFpOX70U+1ZfTXWWNqcqWGI13rtsQGVno+bfBv3P7zskRLagSgXTDyTmciEBiHA3YDi15zJYqvMwA9Ptk/+74GvZQkutFNgoX9WcraJ+qKFOLB4cJg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=IzYQNp23; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=asFJGuG1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.155 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="IzYQNp23"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="asFJGuG1" Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECE91400223; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:47:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:47:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1774630049; x=1774716449; bh=DLa9msu/xc 0iSi92V3ZMpFO2fhsPdByHR3VK54q9Ri8=; b=IzYQNp23kxf/BWxMiR5WWaOZiu ro2WmobjC2PhqHqSqLrJX/1tpOBjwYsTho4KL4FfbiArhd17oQYshGkFMeh2vSxu JfGiWGUMrqOL6oIitbI3KO/qV9wLD5Xuy5W4UoFFl1LStZsFIl9x9rX0QV/oCK+B aqpNSChczNQfpYs8efKZvDfCdu7mINIjyPQZa1jxlO2AE3A/Fv1pH3E5eZhsPwWH ttHEx2HstE0SOV2r0JWWOk+IShUBnHDGkgua2qFFBqN5G7p8e+oqI9Y0vclWLZpo 188zfilltEhkmPwK5L29ZtTa7Shr3ukrLAGWsfND1mTF+aelMO/YQu1Yco7A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1774630049; x=1774716449; bh=DLa9msu/xc0iSi92V3ZMpFO2fhsPdByHR3V K54q9Ri8=; b=asFJGuG1JqBzBbpKgwlVGbjxXl53VXrcXLLoG+hzSuoHIuOCvxh gmjHUagURU0Dq64Iivmh/i3UFmFFZ6/PhronzbrNG8Uu5M+kqTTN1hHBLd8GDJOB wweR/NChIAUReQB+HjnrZTbvykTv7jmmMX7CLAU5NBb8W2ZBt5nRAPGrqePdXR5d TDqAl2ta8Vycy0uydfbKwB66W2Vhxfu6JOt64Ah5OD02kqmsvxT+LvqY6MewjHB0 auKnv2MZonRitIoYyH0zIxCoxFQdsm0VfQB1SwPWrIstt4vKDV/Usowo8eqWLx6Y Wp6ZRpbPKSnaDbLsa/nwucfYY9oFf4iyyfA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdeffedtkedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertd dtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehp ohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeive ffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieegieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmrhhoihhk seguvghlrgihvggurdhsphgrtggvpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnh gvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 12:47:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Mirko Faina Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] improve "git format-patch --commit-list-format" In-Reply-To: (Mirko Faina's message of "Fri, 27 Mar 2026 17:18:10 +0100") References: Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:47:26 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mirko Faina writes: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:04:44AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> When the payload _can_ be specified to wrap (i.e., end-user >> configurable output format), the wrapping should not be forced by >> the mechanism. A project that is not ours may want to keep a single >> long line for their commit list entries. >> >> I do not mind if the default "modern" were defined to include %w() >> to force wrapping to those who follow the default, of course. But >> do not unconditionally wrap what the end-user formatted to their >> liking. > > I see, since there's not much to edit, I'll send the changes regarding > the docs and the wrapping in a single series (I saw that you already > made mf/format-patch-commit-list-format-doc but I hope it is not a > problem), instead of submitting a new one. I do not quite know what you are planning to do with the above four lines, but you do not have to answer me here, as we'll know soon enough once you post them. I'll just have to remember *not* to merge the new -doc topic to 'next' until that happens ;-).