From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 08:47:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250522053235.GB1134267@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 22 May 2025 01:32:35 -0400")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> @@ -460,6 +462,8 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
>
> if (m->packs[pack_int_id])
> return 0;
> + if (m->pack_errs[pack_int_id])
> + return 1;
>
> strbuf_addf(&pack_name, "%s/pack/%s", m->object_dir,
> m->pack_names[pack_int_id]);
> @@ -482,8 +486,10 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
> strbuf_release(&pack_name);
> strbuf_release(&key);
>
> - if (!p)
> + if (!p) {
> + m->pack_errs[pack_int_id] = 1;
> return 1;
> + }
>
> p->multi_pack_index = 1;
> m->packs[pack_int_id] = p;
>
> You could even lazy-malloc the extra array if you wanted to optimize the
> common no-errors case, but I'm not sure it's a big deal.
So the idea is to leave m->packs[] for unused pack NULL instead of
magic value, so that users of that array do not need to check?
I think that is a lot safer than the magic "we know this fails"
value that existing callers that have long trusted that a non-NULL
.packs[] element is a valid pack.
By the way, I suspect I am not reading the code correctly, but I am
not sure what fill_midx_entry() does with a failed case.
midx_for_object(&m, pos);
pack_int_id = nth_midxed_pack_int_id(m, pos);
if (prepare_midx_pack(r, m, pack_int_id))
return 0;
With or without cached failure, this should return 0 when and only
when m->packs[pack_int_id] is a usable pack. But what about the
access on the next line?
p = m->packs[pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base];
Do we have any guarantee that we called prepare_midx_pack() for
the pack at (pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base)th slot? Can p
be NULL here? And with the magic "we know this fails" value, can p
be that magic value?
/*
* We are about to tell the caller where they can locate the
* requested object. We better make sure the packfile is
* still here and can be accessed before supplying that
* answer, as it may have been deleted since the MIDX was
* loaded!
*/
if (!is_pack_valid(p))
return 0;
That value is passed to is_pack_valid(), which I do not think even
takes NULL.
Puzzled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-22 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-16 8:55 [PATCH] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-16 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-19 6:52 ` Jeff King
2025-05-19 15:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-20 6:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22 5:28 ` Jeff King
2025-05-23 1:02 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23 2:03 ` Jeff King
2025-05-20 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-20 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-23 1:03 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-20 9:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22 5:32 ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 15:47 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-22 16:59 ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 1:22 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23 2:08 ` Jeff King
2025-05-23 17:46 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41 ` [PATCH 0/5] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] pack-bitmap.c: fix broken warning() when missing MIDX'd pack Taylor Blau
2025-05-26 7:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 2:00 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26 7:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 2:08 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] midx-write.c: simplify fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26 7:23 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 2:15 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42 ` [PATCH 4/5] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42 ` [PATCH 5/5] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-26 7:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 2:18 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 11:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 22:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] midx: access pack names through `nth_midxed_pack_name()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:22 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:23 ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-30 6:50 ` Jeff King
2025-06-03 22:27 ` Taylor Blau
2025-08-28 23:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 1:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Taylor Blau
2025-05-23 2:18 ` Jeff King
2025-05-21 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Junio C Hamano
2025-05-28 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-30 6:27 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).