git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	 git@vger.kernel.org,  Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 08:47:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250522053235.GB1134267@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Thu, 22 May 2025 01:32:35 -0400")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> @@ -460,6 +462,8 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
>  
>  	if (m->packs[pack_int_id])
>  		return 0;
> +	if (m->pack_errs[pack_int_id])
> +		return 1;
>  
>  	strbuf_addf(&pack_name, "%s/pack/%s", m->object_dir,
>  		    m->pack_names[pack_int_id]);
> @@ -482,8 +486,10 @@ int prepare_midx_pack(struct repository *r, struct multi_pack_index *m,
>  	strbuf_release(&pack_name);
>  	strbuf_release(&key);
>  
> -	if (!p)
> +	if (!p) {
> +		m->pack_errs[pack_int_id] = 1;
>  		return 1;
> +	}
>  
>  	p->multi_pack_index = 1;
>  	m->packs[pack_int_id] = p;
>
> You could even lazy-malloc the extra array if you wanted to optimize the
> common no-errors case, but I'm not sure it's a big deal.

So the idea is to leave m->packs[] for unused pack NULL instead of
magic value, so that users of that array do not need to check?

I think that is a lot safer than the magic "we know this fails"
value that existing callers that have long trusted that a non-NULL
.packs[] element is a valid pack.

By the way, I suspect I am not reading the code correctly, but I am
not sure what fill_midx_entry() does with a failed case.

	midx_for_object(&m, pos);
	pack_int_id = nth_midxed_pack_int_id(m, pos);

	if (prepare_midx_pack(r, m, pack_int_id))
		return 0;

With or without cached failure, this should return 0 when and only
when m->packs[pack_int_id] is a usable pack.  But what about the
access on the next line?

	p = m->packs[pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base];

Do we have any guarantee that we called prepare_midx_pack() for 
the pack at (pack_int_id - m->num_packs_in_base)th slot?  Can p
be NULL here?  And with the magic "we know this fails" value, can p
be that magic value?

	/*
	* We are about to tell the caller where they can locate the
	* requested object.  We better make sure the packfile is
	* still here and can be accessed before supplying that
	* answer, as it may have been deleted since the MIDX was
	* loaded!
	*/
	if (!is_pack_valid(p))
		return 0;

That value is passed to is_pack_valid(), which I do not think even
takes NULL.

Puzzled.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-22 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-16  8:55 [PATCH] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-16 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-19  6:52   ` Jeff King
2025-05-19 15:46     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-20  6:45     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22  5:28       ` Jeff King
2025-05-23  1:02     ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:03       ` Jeff King
2025-05-20  9:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-20  9:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-23  1:03     ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-20  9:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-22  5:32     ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 15:47       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-05-22 16:59         ` Jeff King
2025-05-22 18:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23  1:22           ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:08             ` Jeff King
2025-05-23 17:46               ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                 ` [PATCH 0/5] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 1/5] pack-bitmap.c: fix broken warning() when missing MIDX'd pack Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:00                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 2/5] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:08                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:41                   ` [PATCH 3/5] midx-write.c: simplify fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:23                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:15                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42                   ` [PATCH 4/5] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-25 18:42                   ` [PATCH 5/5] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-26  7:24                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28  2:18                       ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 11:53                         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 22:58                   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] midx: improve prepare_midx_pack() ergonomics Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 1/4] midx: access pack names through `nth_midxed_pack_name()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:47                       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:22                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-29 20:51                       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 22:23                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 2/4] midx-write.c: guard against incremental MIDXs in want_included_pack() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 3/4] midx-write.c: extract inner loop from fill_packs_from_midx() Taylor Blau
2025-05-28 22:59                     ` [PATCH v2 4/4] midx: return a `packed_git` pointer from `prepare_midx_pack()` Taylor Blau
2025-05-30  6:50                       ` Jeff King
2025-06-03 22:27                         ` Taylor Blau
2025-08-28 23:25                           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23  1:31       ` [PATCH v2 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Taylor Blau
2025-05-23  2:18         ` Jeff King
2025-05-21 13:24   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Junio C Hamano
2025-05-28 12:24 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] packfile: explain ordering of how we look up auxiliary pack files Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-28 12:24   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] midx: stop repeatedly looking up nonexistent packfiles Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-30  6:27   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] packfile: avoid access(3p) calls for missing packs Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqbjrk7ikx.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).