From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble+github@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Alex Henrie" <alexhenrie24@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
"Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pull: allow branch.<name>.rebase to override pull.ff=only
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2025 05:08:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbjvgr11y.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205030642.95252-1-ben.knoble+github@gmail.com> (D. Ben Knoble's message of "Tue, 4 Feb 2025 22:06:28 -0500")
"D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble+github@gmail.com> writes:
> When running "git pull" with the following configuration options, we
> fail to merge divergent branches:
>
> - pull.ff=only
> - pull.rebase (unset)
> - branch.<current_branch>.rebase=true
>
> Yet it seems that the user intended to make rebase the default for the
> current branch while using --ff-only for non-rebase pulls. Since this
> case appears uncovered by existing tests, changing the behavior here
> might be safe: it makes what was an error into a successful rebase.
Hmph, to me it looks more like with pull.ff, the user, no matter
what other variables say and which mode between merge and rebase a
pull consolidates the histories, wanted to make sure they will never
accept anything other than fast-forwarding of the history, because
the end-user expects that they will pull only after they push out
everything, i.e., the expectation is that the other side is a strict
fast-forward or the user wants to examine the situation before
making further damage to the local history.
With that understanding, I am not sure "even though pull.ff tells
us to stop unless the other side is a descendant of our history, if
we are rebasing, it is OK if they have something we have never seen"
is a good thing to do.
So, I dunno.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 3:06 [PATCH] pull: allow branch.<name>.rebase to override pull.ff=only D. Ben Knoble
2025-02-05 13:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-02-05 16:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-02-05 17:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-02-05 21:14 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-02-07 2:35 ` Alex Henrie
2025-02-10 20:26 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-02-11 6:55 ` Alex Henrie
2025-04-22 20:03 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-04-22 19:58 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-04-22 20:05 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-04-22 20:07 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-04-22 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbjvgr11y.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=alexhenrie24@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=ben.knoble+github@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).