From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF1A1946C8 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 19:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738265065; cv=none; b=CricgaRN5ZZL43MKfCHal0rdgLo+At4jBBZlOGC+X849934geKbrkpWp68284Oggp9Ae7et6Hz3tUsDKX0aGqgVma6ym21EwztMkxJQbLR2rGU+UCEL0AHE6EqCabvIuDLfc6/F2pUVG818hJ1/teOQ5iE4NrpWPtvhvPc5fX7A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738265065; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FbmRoNNDD5R0/o6dnLx2GGu+ureIdeEX09plkmmUqyI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mfn57VXSNkHO8PRyxV9xLBPAPizNb+FcMhR9X6SQBpLT4L74aHQr0DgmuQioD+paWWtX77qlWH5QPa52SGbK8jiBWF5H4OnmGkGC41IftqcpPOOJrdSglF9VPNDXpAFJ58bU8huieZ/B/Zk/Cv4+VCZG9AN0PXP4VC27s2Cyec0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=D+o/Ozg4; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=EQ1HggZ3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="D+o/Ozg4"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="EQ1HggZ3" Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.phl.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1B71140195; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:24:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:24:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1738265062; x=1738351462; bh=nPIlZ+shgo H1l+HHsowOgtMWMG+SMK577WqCeSpM3cw=; b=D+o/Ozg4ETTEbj1BoCWiPCl6Kh tKZqcLF1MHHAVGEwIpfMicco4j7RftPxxIid9aBh9btA+KzftcLyqmdCDhUEJe90 B1YVKnmDbJZqss9T4JsLL2M29TSH6diws0QKL5GSyCKTWcpWw9EZhWY7uyIYAAuH rawxQV+xquc7XnTHoFkcm2+tO85+XGgD0FvPlm2IRZLv/GR3ZUZqbD66sI3Y+MaT tUuNWed0McAWkwMQXYlmTySNOFFeLwvJZyCKcUJs17ta47ueYFtZqlmhBNoZeump Ot1okAEP0cQC0EzS5J210/Km+e8ElbRYd3RqM1tsc6mJ3f08G7Zoxw1ps2MQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1738265062; x=1738351462; bh=nPIlZ+shgoH1l+HHsowOgtMWMG+SMK577Wq CeSpM3cw=; b=EQ1HggZ3/Tag+GWb7N5L+sWSR6BMq+iraPnbCEUCMmr6pQTJotP GBo+vinoPpL9cAKd9IwffHBZDYs5eKLsZOGanpaQz1BLk9NCr7QoBzU57YTI3vEH ik/fT5oHH1mxmIRHzJLInS44EsH3g1IoM30Bf3E0G9qRlNKsbBahawiP9CEIJhEU 9qEUkcLejCz0CQQEilib85ZSwU0/gu00XEn8f8L89sjcz702KjtyQiMo718T+5o6 +/kiTU5HAhY8Xa+lHp/6vRl0sp9FpO9JWJVS0K3RGZnvvdwyBm099PiyOcG9SN0W sXQInh0B3Pl2M5Vg+Y1w3uVPaIqrQFMKVQg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgdeiieehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtofdttdertden ucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogi drtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepieekueefhfetvdfftdegfeekhfffgefgfeei vddugeffgfffffevvedvieelffdunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrg hmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghp thhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepphhhihhllhhiphdrfi hoohguuddvfeesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgv rhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdprhgtphhtthhopehsuh hnshhhihhnvgesshhunhhshhhinhgvtghordgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshhovghkkhhl vgesfhhrvggvnhgvthdruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtg homh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 30 Jan 2025 14:24:21 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, sunshine@sunshineco.com, =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren?= Krecker Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] add-patch: Fix type conversion warnings from msvc In-Reply-To: <57031bce-6dc4-48a7-b4b5-1b837ea3ab8f@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:47:22 +0000") References: <20250126125638.3089-1-soekkle@freenet.de> <20250126125638.3089-2-soekkle@freenet.de> <6a251603-25bc-415d-ab8c-ae698bd7977a@gmail.com> <57031bce-6dc4-48a7-b4b5-1b837ea3ab8f@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 11:24:20 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Phillip Wood writes: > On 29/01/2025 19:52, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Phillip Wood writes: >> By the way, who is >> >> and why is such an apparently bogus e-mail address Cc'ed? > > That's the Reply-To address from the mail I was replying > to. Unfortunately it does not seem to exist. It just occured to me that it is probably added by a mistake and the sender really wanted to add it to In-Reply-To: instead of Reply-To: I wonder if this is a mistake we can do something to help users avoid? "git send-email" has the "--reply-to=" option and there is a valid use case for that option, so disabling that option is a non-starter. Of course there are other ways to send e-mailed patches, but I do not think of a way to misuse them with reply-to and in-reply-to mixed up. Thoughts?