From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B162617554 for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 16:34:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715618076; cv=none; b=PCQQmq568TqkwdRa4Wi3aIdQObvqJEQo7PSWZ3aCpPh5WB2A48AOF7ExrKTFzDvPG9OclgxXxkb4bmQWXSBST+dem+36GbCMocN5enULKHDUr6cZk4WkGeSKcSqNqXHmkRhnOS27xNJ8TWFAnT3nXNWTaER+sZcUe4mzrRw4psM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715618076; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uafo+gdK+e9hWD/UYwIh/odi2rUlyIMTb82QfYDzeWQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DnwhJ7bmTAy2mdriW3U0qG5LXMfdnJU4ahDfYFk+HCQF4YPkJ/vbHxFpqu6tyi65u5/N+RIAZ67sEE7X6GgRfsHzBZask+0lfiMniUQE49+fmtmkbTaL86eMsd8adMUrqLM78QpclMBWQxva5XW+sh0HafMv/Zt4E3/HwQmC9wU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=V5QSgqQP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.52 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="V5QSgqQP" Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6A23539C; Mon, 13 May 2024 12:34:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uafo+gdK+e9hWD/UYwIh/odi2rUlyIMTb82QfY DzeWQ=; b=V5QSgqQPrHSzTWBUWDwniQ4+iDtrhYJDK+QkLBnHaDxOCfg0Tg53cY 3YEgC2IYD2YV7Zcg5NuTe+lVnpw6x6FAOK1u50LhMN7KZEqepox88HV4OJ0HOBgj ShkZ6fwE+0fywM7CtoiA48H5PNPslrcRBIfYsLUM1HrsEtHqRdzII= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154A43539B; Mon, 13 May 2024 12:34:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.153.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BF363539A; Mon, 13 May 2024 12:34:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2024, #05; Sat, 11) In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Mon, 13 May 2024 07:49:41 +0200") References: Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 09:34:23 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A8A50E1A-1146-11EF-8614-F515D2CDFF5E-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Patrick Steinhardt writes: >> * ps/pseudo-ref-terminology (2024-05-10) 10 commits >> - refs: refuse to write pseudorefs >> - ref-filter: properly distinuish pseudo and root refs >> - refs: pseudorefs are no refs >> - refs: classify HEAD as a root ref >> - refs: root refs can be symbolic refs >> - refs: refname `is_special_ref()` to `is_pseudo_ref()` >> - refs: rename `is_pseudoref()` to `is_root_ref()` >> - Documentation/glossary: define root refs as refs >> - Documentation/glossary: clarify limitations of pseudorefs >> - Documentation/glossary: redefine pseudorefs as special refs >> >> Terminology to call various ref-like things are getting >> straightened out. >> >> Comments? >> source: > > There have been a bunch of comments on these topics already, and overall > they have been positive. Is there something specific that you want to > see here? I did not get the feeling that we have given the series enough time to be seen and get commented on; indeed v4 has not got enough time to get any comments yet? Also you haven't responded either positively or negatively to comments on v3 07/10 by Peff?