From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD10E8825 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 18:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709316934; cv=none; b=kZ4YUOqxCkaP+jPpI8LNjN3K21lz3oGEy1sWHmuPkUZxPhIAW7DPN/QpFyc6C5/KJ5xSwM4d/m/YHjI9otOvYAVemn5rQQoh9/xGZrSc6/0PAzDSc5z9C4Ia91Wh1SAl/aCSpkQJwvXk/VWHrD+eJqVxY85aMSFjCRaZ4uorOdE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709316934; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aifyi56jKCpL70S5x/ra0Mj6l8qoSA4FYbmu7P3p/tU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cTTQK/XaAItkTEb3vx4b/jCeOtgEhSTHwxMmowKGHfKk+ksjTwJ7LCX2DNJ+qBdW2u86DTUdUoenFUO7W4miBtL1mqR0OvxHOwpH2KBakvrU2L+YfRoi+iC+qLx8jpM8SUVKQVvof6oXbcoxg+gIZDSvQN4RArA8Jpy9YPCHIZE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=XETOWbb0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=173.228.157.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="XETOWbb0" Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAA61E14C; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:15:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aifyi56jKCpL70S5x/ra0Mj6l8qoSA4FYbmu7P 3p/tU=; b=XETOWbb04qtfIzKuN+4lz8jmioJQ5bOolRGRUo5Ddct9tF/sMhW/O7 jEGKCDhByIq1HgO5L9LK3x6uza+JE/WThEZltGWrcNUUKhKTWB6u+P3vmxseNpwx o5At2/o15WlvjLAzR8u3KgvTakOQsUEU9/ZuEzD+RsjC7VEQWA7pI= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0252F1E14B; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:15:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.125.176.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B1FA1E14A; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 13:15:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Haritha D Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" , Kristoffer Haugsbakk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] build: support z/OS (OS/390). In-Reply-To: (Haritha D.'s message of "Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:09:17 +0000") References: Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 10:15:26 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AE996D30-D7F7-11EE-8F20-A19503B9AAD1-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Haritha D writes: > The win test(7) test case failed stating the reason as "The > Operation cancelled". I saw that it failed after 5 hours 59 > minutes of running the test cases(build). How do I handle this? Those "win test (n)", at least some of them, seem to have been somewhat flaky [*1*]. If you are certain you did not break them with your change, you do not have to fix them yourself. I am a wrong person to ask how the test failure that may [*2*] block GGG submission can be circumvented, as I am not involved in that machinery at all. Thanks. [Footnotes] *1* Also I've seen osx-clang job time-out from time to time, without failing any specific test. Re-running failed jobs from the menu often make them pass, which is why I said "somewhat flaky". *2* I do not even know if GGG refuses to submit a series with a test failure, let alone if it allows to override such a safety if exists.