From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E15C433F5 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 00:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490B261A7A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2021 00:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232079AbhJBAks (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:40:48 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:55704 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231347AbhJBAkr (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:40:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B8D154AA2; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:39:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=H9gA9CxoxqzPa4zuUjB9j+2t03wZCmrhRoUZYK n7BtI=; b=V/bz1ipd1AzPZPIFEopbKJx3gRFlBloApFNEF/c2b69/QVVmlfHF+f Z3c2OlvQAiq4BskTukYGXRD4G8RcAImVtNdH8kfKg6UFhi3d8WIqW2vfrP4yBVSp wFMN3i8bizQG83OIR+6LNLQQNXUlPyTZ//QHlo2KHzekbt0OYcDiw= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCE1154AA1; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:39:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D0284154A9D; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 20:38:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" Cc: Derrick Stolee , git@vger.kernel.org, Philippe Blain , Johannes Schindelin , Elijah Newren , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rebase: reset_head() related fixes and improvements References: Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2021 17:38:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2021 10:04:51 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 21BACE94-2319-11EC-ACF2-98D80D944F46-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" writes: > Fix some issues with the implementation and use of reset_head(). The last > patch was previously posted as [1], I have updated the commit message and > rebased it onto the fixes in this series. There are a couple of small > conflicts merging this into seen, I think they should be easy to resolve (in > rebase.c take both sides in reset.c take the changed lines from each side). > These patches are based on pw/rebase-of-a-tag-fix When merged with other topics in flight in 'seen', this seems to fail the t1092 test (most likely, ds/add-rm-with-sparse-index is what this interacts badly with). Thanks.