From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADCDC433DB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4678423A54 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726439AbhAUXLU (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:11:20 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65310 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725275AbhAUXKt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:10:49 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07143B4244; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:10:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=X8MRdBJ8adyNEwKD1fOM4REfqmY=; b=ngmT1Q w3A8zg4NXGQXBKigwaTsY/uQfDf6Qb0IqVZWXaRQohpxbJmlfAo5jtkREGx6oQEA S1Hi7mqVFJ7hff+nQU8kOMFlvzXakh/zxAPrko2aj1kiwtNKSY+JC0IWedYAbzsr siyR9600ayBLWB7BSC4UxtB/ec3gkBMZiCM6A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dJ3uYEYll+qNftOANySuneHPXWxmcxRg oNofGKllrZ5gd2s/bheBvayxFK0UQF6lEgaZx1OFyRp9e05giEWK8S/nvy9EwZ7P hQ0/42l8F0j5Cgvzri4+5WWXnXsKlIWlAITxnSHLFHdRtfBx3hE7pXjU3ss+kYXe ZTPiWFxzok0= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593AAB4241; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:10:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.196.36.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9720B423D; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 18:10:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2021, #04; Sat, 16) References: <20210121183427.1783539-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:10:03 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20210121183427.1783539-1-jonathantanmy@google.com> (Jonathan Tan's message of "Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:34:27 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CBF3993E-5C3D-11EB-B38C-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Tan writes: >> * jt/clone-unborn-head (2020-12-22) 3 commits >> - clone: respect remote unborn HEAD >> - connect, transport: add no-op arg for future patch >> - ls-refs: report unborn targets of symrefs >> >> "git clone" tries to locally check out the branch pointed at by >> HEAD of the remote repository after it is done, but the protocol >> did not convey the information necessary to do so when copying an >> empty repository. The protocol v2 learned how to do so. >> >> What's the status of this thing? > > Several people have commented on the high-level approach (and I have > addressed those comments), but I don't think anyone has said that the > code itself looks OK. I'll see if I can get some of my colleagues to > review this. Thanks.