From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: Joshua Nelson <jyn514@gmail.com>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 15:05:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqbmbonff3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BFu+m-7Fyf4kj8hUO33vhAxKuAu5JnyL5Tzc7c6Kq+Hjg@mail.gmail.com> (Elijah Newren's message of "Tue, 3 Jul 2018 00:12:43 -0700")
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:58 PM, Joshua Nelson <jyn514@gmail.com> wrote:
>> use syntax similar to `git-checkout` to make <tree-ish> optional for
>> `ls-tree`. if <tree-ish> is omitted, default to HEAD. infer arguments as
>> follows:
>>
>> 1. if args start with --
>> assume <tree-ish> to be HEAD
>> 2. if exactly one arg precedes --, treat the argument as <tree-ish>
>> 3. if more than one arg precedes --, exit with an error
>> 4. if -- is not in args
>> a) if args[0] is a valid <tree-ish> object, treat is as such
>> b) else, assume <tree-ish> to be HEAD
>>
>> in all cases, every argument besides <tree-ish> is treated as a <path>
>
> Cool, this is something I've wanted a few times.
Hmph, is it, and why?
I'd prefer *not* to have such a DWIM in a command like ls-tree, aka
plumbing commands, where predictability is worth 1000 times more
than ease of typing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-03 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-03 3:58 [PATCH 1/3] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional Joshua Nelson
2018-07-03 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] ls-tree: update usage info Joshua Nelson
2018-07-03 7:14 ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 7:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-03 3:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] ls-tree: add unit tests for arguments Joshua Nelson
2018-07-03 7:30 ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 7:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-03 7:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] ls-tree: make <tree-ish> optional Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-07-03 22:55 ` Elijah Newren
2018-07-03 22:58 ` Joshua Nelson
2018-07-06 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-06 21:26 ` Joshua Nelson
2018-07-06 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-07-03 7:15 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-03 23:15 ` Joshua Nelson
2018-07-03 23:53 ` [PATCH] " Joshua Nelson
2018-07-04 0:05 ` Joshua Nelson
2018-07-04 9:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-04 10:04 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-07-04 9:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqbmbonff3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jyn514@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).