From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456620C11 for ; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 23:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753324AbdK0Xw6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:52:58 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:65065 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753241AbdK0Xw5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:52:57 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0557196C78; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:52:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=xD280KQ5gkAcdW3XS63CNowKrsE=; b=rb9PrI uZPX5Ld+yC9WSIJx9RCAveJMZJtah2Jap0BQXx67s697oeK2ddWfatigg4YL9lqa CIzpkERlM3BIayu+Gb/hGOJdOAoFHXkIPmtw4TV/eChheJeIsvZ1bW3704x9Cmut z43fWXYJBDmmxF6XksfBXVE5Pmv6wodrqXk0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Rsnww+ub1ejMPtTkcYJsickbyr3DovYJ TYEstnIHdMe9H03G2Yk3+KLPkcEUFg5IiwVocU6fA+0bJT+Po5Q0n087V/2xwgyu BCo2sP3X1UM/UTWgQ+CZGzh3qiXH8sfMLcDJ1mbWzQQGNvs0FrIhrpGWUyPoYX+0 SKe5B9iJ2gM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE79E96C74; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:52:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 596B896C73; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 18:52:56 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Takuto Ikuta , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use OBJECT_INFO_QUICK to speedup git fetch-pack References: <0102015ffbbb2905-570eadd1-6b5c-46af-a3a9-bddfbd01c242-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <20171127043740.GA5994@sigill> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:52:55 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:24:46 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 173AC206-D3CE-11E7-B05D-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > My current plan is to release a new Git for Windows version on Wednesday, > to allow for a new cURL version to be bundled. Is this an updated 2.15.0 or are you planning to package 2.15.1? I am asking because you earlier asked me to hold 2.15.1 while you were away last week and there are accumulated changes on 'maint'. As I won't be online later this week, unless I cut 2.15.1 today or early tomorrow, it will have to be done early next week, and I'd prefer not to do 2.15.1 _immediately_ after a platform announces an updated release of 2.15.0 for obvious reasons.