Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Taylor Blau <ttaylorr@openai.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	 Ted Nyman <tnyman@openai.com>,
	 Elijah Newren <newren@github.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] pack-objects: ensure tree/tag closure with '--stdin-packs=follow'
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 10:51:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcxtubpbj.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6348667e2e3fe63aeb139888e877dd8447570253.1790731662.git.me@ttaylorr.com> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2026 20:28:49 -0500")

Taylor Blau <ttaylorr@openai.com> writes:

> @@ -4574,6 +4603,9 @@ static int add_loose_object(const struct object_id *oid, const char *path,
>  
>  	if (ctx && type == OBJ_COMMIT)
>  		add_pending_oid(ctx->revs, NULL, oid, 0);
> +	else if (ctx && ctx->mode == STDIN_PACKS_MODE_FOLLOW &&
> +		 (type == OBJ_TREE || type == OBJ_TAG))
> +		oid_array_append(&ctx->extra_roots, oid);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

Makes me wonder if this function will always end with "if ctx is not
NULL, then depending on these conditions do one more thing" like
this, or if it would change later.  If the former,


	if (!ctx)
		return 0;

	if (type == OBJ_COMMIT)
		do the commit thing;
	else if (ctx->mode == follow && type in (tree, tag))
		do the tag or tree thing;

	return 0;

might be easier to follow, perhaps?

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30  1:28 [PATCH 0/4] repack: various corner cases for cruft-less MIDXs Taylor Blau
2026-09-30  1:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] pack-objects: introduce `stdin_packs_context` struct Taylor Blau
2026-09-30 17:42   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-01  3:13     ` Taylor Blau
2026-09-30  1:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] pack-objects: ensure tree/tag closure with '--stdin-packs=follow' Taylor Blau
2026-09-30 17:51   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-09-30 18:16   ` Derrick Stolee
2026-10-01  3:14     ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-01 23:22     ` Elijah Newren
2026-10-02  0:51       ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:02         ` Jeff King
2026-09-30 20:31   ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  3:18     ` Taylor Blau
2026-09-30  1:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] repack: retain cruft packs in MIDXs after incremental repacks Taylor Blau
2026-09-30 20:45   ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  3:21     ` Taylor Blau
2026-09-30  1:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] repack: retain cruft packs in MIDXs containing kept packs Taylor Blau
2026-09-30 20:53   ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  3:35     ` Taylor Blau
2026-09-30 20:55 ` [PATCH 0/4] repack: various corner cases for cruft-less MIDXs Jeff King
2026-10-01  3:37   ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] " Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 1/8] pack-objects: introduce `stdin_packs_context` struct Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 2/8] pack-objects: ensure tree/tag closure with '--stdin-packs=follow' Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:13     ` Jeff King
2026-10-03  0:55       ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-03  1:06         ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 3/8] repack: retain cruft packs in MIDXs after incremental repacks Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 4/8] repack: use a sorted list for explicitly kept packs Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:16     ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 5/8] repack: follow kept packs when omitting cruft from the MIDX Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:25     ` Jeff King
2026-10-03  0:50       ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:11   ` [PATCH v2 6/8] repack: track the preferred pack explicitly in MIDX write steps Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:28     ` Jeff King
2026-10-03  1:00       ` Taylor Blau
2026-10-03  1:07         ` Jeff King
2026-10-01  4:12   ` [PATCH v2 7/8] repack: defer allocating the append plan's write step Taylor Blau
2026-10-01  4:12   ` [PATCH v2 8/8] repack: include required packs in incremental MIDX writes Taylor Blau
2026-10-02 23:41     ` Jeff King
2026-10-03  1:01       ` Taylor Blau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqcxtubpbj.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=newren@github.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=tnyman@openai.com \
    --cc=ttaylorr@openai.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox