From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] t/lib-httpd: make http-429 first-request check atomic
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 13:02:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcxwxtfkp.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <efd34c17157b3183cdc851c8b17e7967b6c85506.1783479584.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget's message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2026 02:59:42 +0000")
"Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> -# Check if this is the first call (no state file exists)
> -if test -f "$state_file"
> +# Apache can run this CGI for concurrent requests, so the script decides
> +# whether this is the first call with a single atomic "mkdir": it succeeds for
> +# exactly one of any racing requests and fails for the rest. "permanent"
> +# always rate-limits and records no state.
> +if test "$retry_after" != permanent && ! mkdir "$state" 2>/dev/null
I think the last sentence in the above comment was meant to explain
why the new code checks the value of "$retry_after", but it is not
clear if it is needed for correctness (in other words, the original
was wrong to do "test -f && touch" but also was wrong to do so even
when "$retry_after" is set to "permanent), or if it is a mere
"optimization opportunity" you are taking advantage of. In either
case, it would be nice to see it explained in the proposed commit
log message.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 2:59 [PATCH 0/3] t/lib-httpd: make CGI test helpers concurrency-safe Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-08 2:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] t/lib-httpd: fix apply-one-time-script race under concurrent requests Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-08 19:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-09 17:26 ` Michael Montalbo
2026-07-08 2:59 ` [PATCH 2/3] t/lib-httpd: make http-429 first-request check atomic Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-08 19:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-08 20:02 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-07-09 18:10 ` Michael Montalbo
2026-07-08 2:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] t/README: document writing concurrency-safe helpers Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-08 19:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-07-10 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] t/lib-httpd: make CGI test helpers concurrency-safe Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t/lib-httpd: fix apply-one-time-script race under concurrent requests Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] t/lib-httpd: make http-429 first-request check atomic Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
2026-07-10 17:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] t/README: document writing concurrency-safe helpers Michael Montalbo via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcxwxtfkp.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=mmontalbo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox