From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:32:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcy4cxn2l.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218-b4-pks-odb-read-object-info-improvements-v1-4-81c8368492be@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:28:14 +0100")
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> @@ -2148,8 +2162,13 @@ int packfile_store_read_object_info(struct packfile_store *store,
> * We know that the caller doesn't actually need the
> * information below, so return early.
> */
> - if (oi == &blank_oi)
> + if (oi == &blank_oi) {
> + oi->whence = OI_PACKED;
> + oi->u.packed.offset = e.offset;
> + oi->u.packed.pack = e.p;
> + oi->u.packed.type = PACKED_OBJECT_TYPE_UNKNOWN;
It cannot be seen as it is before the precontext, but if blank_oi is
still a function scope static that is initialized only once by
assigning OBJECT_INFO_INIT, this will leave a timg bomb waiting to
go off, as it violates the "blank"-ness promise for the next caller
of this function who calls NULL in oi.
I'd prefer we fix this nonsense "we only declared a function scope
static, but without actually using it for anything, other than to
compare its address with the caller supplied parameter" well before
this step.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-18 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-18 6:28 [PATCH 0/8] Improvements for reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] object-file: always set OI_LOOSE when " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] packfile: always declare object info to be OI_PACKED Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 7:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-12-18 9:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] packfile: extend `is_delta` field to allow for "unknown" state Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 7:32 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] packfile: disentangle return value of `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] packfile: skip unpacking object header for disk size requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] packfile: fix short-circuiting of empty requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 6:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] packfile: drop repository parameter from `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 8:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] Improvements for reading object info Junio C Hamano
2025-12-18 8:30 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] object-file: always set OI_LOOSE when " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] packfile: always declare object info to be OI_PACKED Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] packfile: extend `is_delta` field to allow for "unknown" state Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-30 17:03 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] packfile: disentangle return value of `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] packfile: skip unpacking object header for disk size requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] packfile: drop repository parameter from `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcy4cxn2l.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=aplattner@nvidia.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).