git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,  Aaron Plattner <aplattner@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 16:32:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcy4cxn2l.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251218-b4-pks-odb-read-object-info-improvements-v1-4-81c8368492be@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Thu, 18 Dec 2025 07:28:14 +0100")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> @@ -2148,8 +2162,13 @@ int packfile_store_read_object_info(struct packfile_store *store,
>  	 * We know that the caller doesn't actually need the
>  	 * information below, so return early.
>  	 */
> -	if (oi == &blank_oi)
> +	if (oi == &blank_oi) {
> +		oi->whence = OI_PACKED;
> +		oi->u.packed.offset = e.offset;
> +		oi->u.packed.pack = e.p;
> +		oi->u.packed.type = PACKED_OBJECT_TYPE_UNKNOWN;

It cannot be seen as it is before the precontext, but if blank_oi is
still a function scope static that is initialized only once by
assigning OBJECT_INFO_INIT, this will leave a timg bomb waiting to
go off, as it violates the "blank"-ness promise for the next caller
of this function who calls NULL in oi.

I'd prefer we fix this nonsense "we only declared a function scope
static, but without actually using it for anything, other than to
compare its address with the caller supplied parameter" well before
this step.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-18  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-18  6:28 [PATCH 0/8] Improvements for reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 1/8] object-file: always set OI_LOOSE when " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 2/8] packfile: always declare object info to be OI_PACKED Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  7:23   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-12-18  9:10     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 3/8] packfile: extend `is_delta` field to allow for "unknown" state Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 4/8] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  7:32   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 5/8] packfile: disentangle return value of `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 6/8] packfile: skip unpacking object header for disk size requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] packfile: fix short-circuiting of empty requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  6:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] packfile: drop repository parameter from `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18  8:09 ` [PATCH 0/8] Improvements for reading object info Junio C Hamano
2025-12-18  8:30   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 1/7] object-file: always set OI_LOOSE when " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 2/7] packfile: always declare object info to be OI_PACKED Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 3/7] packfile: extend `is_delta` field to allow for "unknown" state Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 4/7] packfile: always populate pack-specific info when reading object info Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-30 17:03     ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 5/7] packfile: disentangle return value of `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 6/7] packfile: skip unpacking object header for disk size requests Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-18 10:54   ` [PATCH v2 7/7] packfile: drop repository parameter from `packed_object_info()` Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqqcy4cxn2l.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=aplattner@nvidia.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).