From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
Cc: Mark Mentovai <mark@chromium.org>,
Git Development <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] t: run tests from a normalized working directory
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 09:38:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcybnxvr2.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250531054618.GA30443@tb-raspi4> ("Torsten Bögershausen"'s message of "Sat, 31 May 2025 07:46:18 +0200")
Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> writes:
> The word canonical has been removed.
> After reading the help for
> 'pwd -P' and 'cd -P'
> "absolute" is replaced by "physical".
> A matter of taste.
> If absolute is more used here in Git, I am fine with any.
It is OK as long as we are locally consistent. I do think inside
our codebase it seems we use "absolute" more, but the change in
question is about use of "-P" option, which certainly was taken from
"physical", in our test scripts, so I am OK with your description
below to use that word.
If somebody really cared (and I don't), we may want to pick a single
word among physical, absolute, and real, but the only thing is that
we are using them interchangeably, so as long as we make it clear
(e.g. perhaps strbuf_realpath() and the underlying helper functions
that are used by it may have a comment or two that says that we use
these three words interchangeably to our developers), it would be
good enough.
> ==================================================
> t: run 7900 tests from the physical working directory
>
> Some tests make git perform actions that produce observable pathnames,
> and have expectations on those paths. Tests run with $HOME set to a
> $TRASH_DIRECTORY, and with their working directory the same
> $TRASH_DIRECTORY, although these paths are physical identical, they do
> not observe the same pathname normalization rules and thus might not
> be represented by strings that compare equal.
> In particular, no pathname
> normalization is applied to $TRASH_DIRECTORY or $HOME, while tests
> change their working directory with `cd -P` which resolves symbolic links
> returning the physical path.
"physical identical"? I think the problem is $HOME and $TRASH are
the same but not physically normalized, which means "cd $HOME &&
pwd", "cd $HOME && pwd -P" and "cd -P $HOME && pwd" can give
different results from these two variables. How about replacing the
latter half of the above with something much simpler, like this?
... although HOME and TRASH_DIRECTORY have identical values, the
physical path to it (i.e. what "cd $HOME && pwd -P" reports) may
be different.
> t7900's macOS maintenance tests (which are not limited to running on
> macOS) have an expectation on a path that `git maintenance` forms by
> using abspath.c strbuf_realpath() to resolve the physical path
> based on $HOME. When t7900 runs from a working directory that contains
> symbolic links in its pathname, $HOME will also contain symbolic links,
> which `git maintenance` resolves but the test's expectation does not,
> causing a test failure.
>
> Align $TRASH_DIRECTORY and $HOME with the physical path as used for
> the working directory by resetting them to match the working directory
> after it's established by `cd -P`. With all paths in agreement and
> symbolic links resolved, pathname expectations can be set and met based
> on string comparison without regard to external environmental factors
> such as the presence of symbolic links in a path.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-01 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-23 19:37 [PATCH] t7900: use pwd -P in macOS maintenance test Mark Mentovai
2025-05-23 20:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-23 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 21:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-23 21:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-24 4:39 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-05-27 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-23 20:43 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-05-23 21:36 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-05-28 20:17 ` [PATCH v2] t: run tests from a normalized working directory Mark Mentovai
2025-05-28 23:08 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-05-30 5:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-31 5:46 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-06-01 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-06-02 16:08 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-06-02 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-03 5:02 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2025-06-03 13:15 ` Mark Mentovai
2025-06-03 18:22 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcybnxvr2.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@chromium.org \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).