From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a8-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD664254AF1 for ; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 23:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745017355; cv=none; b=HVxPAa0mRgnnyiuij50L1Uj8r3QJKNONg5b4LejqvndTi7GQGhhzz3xbNSc8dTC20/P3jZCn65hZ37UQUN7WfT8fVgbJRQyzhy6kZBDtJNygPlOz5I3suzfePO5rZZgxU2eR31xkWsIvYBvpCtlKAFgLI9s8O32Ra31Ndh2sm0M= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745017355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fZG+jkFwZHySgYRd9sdri0Kp5VURSJIbCEbUCxYDaAQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GMSKOtZihW4nA34f1J6ialR9y7zZTljWEnieSON1CWFgODadi40gWHErnlzQuiSEpLMg/Hg9vgj7m/+ERBWKGu82zqa4vHmZ0ajMeM3dU1LSeIn8sixRegHFRoKs43I8/4P7gcdCCHjh8IdCyVfRySWjL4X6CmxmgjrbkHmwpU4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=TNpaovjO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=xb61Hi0K; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="TNpaovjO"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="xb61Hi0K" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.phl.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E813801F3; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:02:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:02:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1745017351; x=1745103751; bh=HYENM0Qwd8 F6ixvIDoyoSQGv7q2nTMIMeTMRFspBg40=; b=TNpaovjOflcAbbFFULXoz9auKA Gem3VSzYYf1Zz1Su87e5xh6iAKruiJY8v15ze4H57/SJhl8pHG8ZwotYDbRgDHAG VWOuI44gUJJMXGMyvbzDuOW4HO5RbP7UGlq5BXBgPCVGnfNW62W9NaZLUJh1th46 TriW94oYuBTKvjXQGcYeQ9wOXPLbOhoVK+K3aXkcVSPXZxJWq6sBzuWLSuZJl3Ia PBmDK65tAz7nBckdsAKvjmIO0Ey1wUhT7NAOW5V/oHTxHhyR4hQ9+dKBoXGp6PWj Eu+I9ogLN69+KJiGFQD1LHtCrGErSHkIpOaz3Z6G7MEXXn80lJfzigJnEbew== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1745017351; x=1745103751; bh=HYENM0Qwd8F6ixvIDoyoSQGv7q2nTMIMeTM RFspBg40=; b=xb61Hi0KkebvuuGXvJ15gSaQ5YAgGGrj4JCKVjRh2Xap6fwc3op qm5gNe3KJkZZh0cbSza18JlntYPE8yYyUr2xf5DIdzFJfSGIbeT0F0gmcuyH8dck MX2GdHFjCu47/lOql0/TXEjkkkbt147iXTF+J1jseeeYlnaCTLJz4q1vf7PBqKeS KQTWB0jfNQkEp601FjD0dCO0IIwAIq+fwCd+LxasyhHy55sW0dBXILEkfOcHiLFz GCuxfm8iyE+kSeZvMA/RuvvIi0r8vv2CB4LpBCEgwGZusCkeihJBVdDibCEm7g6z A+I0+Vrk9tgZy0HW2/qcCwXYpTYHpPuE+9w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvfeefgedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttder tdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcuvecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosg hogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffeiteeujeevfeehuddvjeduffeijeeg fefhtddvkeefjeejhedtgeefgfeijedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgihht shhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeegpdhmohguvgepshhmth hpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhg vghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehkrghrthhhihhkrddukeeksehgmh grihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 18 Apr 2025 19:02:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] meson: wire up support for benchmarks In-Reply-To: (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2025 13:00:11 +0200") References: <20250331-pks-meson-benchmarks-v1-0-b2ace85616a3@pks.im> <20250414-pks-meson-benchmarks-v2-0-04377080a167@pks.im> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 16:02:29 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Patrick Steinhardt writes: >> This one >> >> https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/14406901394 >> >> is from last week without the earlier iteration of this topic, which >> fails a few meson jobs. >> >> linux-meson job that fails with >> >> meson.build:689:19: ERROR: Command `/usr/bin/git -C /__w/git/git ls-files --deduplicate '*.h' ':!contrib' ':!compat/inet_ntop.c' ':!compat/inet_pton.c' ':!compat/nedmalloc' ':!compat/obstack.*' ':!compat/poll' ':!compat/regex' ':!sha1collisiondetection' ':!sha1dc' ':!t/unit-tests/clar' ':!t/unit-tests/clar' ':!t/t[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]*'` failed with status 128. > > Hm, curious. These lines have been moved here by kn/meson-hdr-check, but > the logic already existed beforehand. I've Cc'd Karthik -- it would > probably make sense to investigate (and ideally also fix) the issue as > part of that series. Indeed. I tentatively kicked meson-hdr-check topic out of 'seen' and the CI seems to be a lot happier. What is curious is that in my local environment 'seen' with meson-hdr-check topic did not fail for me.