From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, ps@pks.im,
james@jamesliu.io, peff@peff.net, gombasgg@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] advice: refuse to output if stderr not TTY
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:25:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcym0sexi.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e90949ed-8065-4498-9ddb-3d5c6afa7b35@gmail.com> (Derrick Stolee's message of "Thu, 22 Aug 2024 09:15:42 -0400")
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> writes:
> On 8/21/24 7:02 AM, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>> Advice is supposed to be for humans, not machines. Why do we output it when
>> stderr is not a terminal? Let's stop doing that.
>> I'm labeling this as an RFC because I believe there is some risk
>> with this
>> change.
>
> Thanks, all, for the feedback about the risk of making such a change. I
> agree that we should not pursue this direction.
>
> The main issues are:
>
> 1. Some tools create a wrapper around Git and may want to supply the
> advice to the user by parsing stderr.
Or they may just pass it through to the user without even parsing.
> 2. The advice system has been on for a long time and we cannot know
> where other dependencies could be for it.
>
> I'll abandon this RFC, but plan on the following action items:
>
> * Document GIT_ADVICE in Documentation/git.exe.
>
> * Modify Documentation/config/advice.txt to mention GIT_ADVICE and
> recommend that automated tools calling Git commands set it to zero.
FWIW, not documenting it was very much deliberate to discourage
folks placing it in their ~/.login file. I am OK with the above as
long as "this is for tools" is stressed well enough.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-22 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-21 11:02 [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] advice: refuse to output if stderr not TTY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] t1000-2000: add GIT_ADVICE=1 for advice tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] t3000-4000: add GIT_ADVICE=1 to " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] t5000: " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] t6000: " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] t7000: " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 6/7] t7508/12: set GIT_ADVICE=1 across all tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 11:02 ` [PATCH 7/7] advice: refuse to output if stderr not TTY Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2024-08-21 15:40 ` [PATCH 0/7] [RFC] " Jeff King
2024-08-21 16:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-21 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-22 6:19 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-08-22 6:03 ` Gabor Gombas
2024-08-22 13:15 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-08-22 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcym0sexi.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gombasgg@gmail.com \
--cc=james@jamesliu.io \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).