From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Abhijeet Sonar <abhijeet.nkt@gmail.com>
Cc: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Paul Millar <paul.millar@desy.de>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] describe: refresh the index when 'broken' flag is used
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 09:34:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqcyo6cnbb.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <735b4a95-fe8e-4bff-9dd3-10ddd4bdb5b5@gmail.com> (Abhijeet Sonar's message of "Mon, 24 Jun 2024 19:18:33 +0530")
Abhijeet Sonar <abhijeet.nkt@gmail.com> writes:
> I would like to change the owner of a file
> in the test case I am writing -- an operation
> that requires super-user privileges. I am not
> sure if it is okay to do that in tests. Since
> that would require running tests with `sudo`.
What is the reason why you want to change the owner of a file in
your test?
If it is merely to make sure you cannot write to the .git/index
file, temporarily doing chmod of the .git directory in a test (with
POSIXPERM prerequisite) may be one way to do so, and you do not need
the second user in the system test is running.
Or if you pretend that you have a second process that is holding the
lock in .git/index by creating .git/index.lock file yourself, that
would also prevent your tested command from touching the index.
The latter approach would result in a test that may look like so (I
am writing this in my mail client, and I expect there may be some
fix ups needed):
test_expect_success 'see what --broken does upon unwritable index' '
test_when_finished "rm -f .git/index.lock" &&
test_commit A A.file &&
echo changed >>A.file &&
>.git/index.lock &&
test_must_fail git describe --dirty >actual 2>error &&
test_grep "could not write index" error &&
git describe --broken --dirty >actual 2>error &&
test_grep ! "could not write index" error &&
echo ...expected.describe.result... >expect &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
HTH.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-24 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-23 21:42 [PATCH] describe: refresh the index when 'broken' flag is used Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-23 21:56 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-24 10:56 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-24 11:20 ` Phillip Wood
2024-06-24 12:20 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-24 13:48 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-24 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2024-06-24 17:37 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-24 17:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-06-25 6:40 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-25 6:44 ` [PATCH v2] " Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-25 12:27 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-06-25 13:22 ` Abhijeet Sonar
2024-06-25 12:28 ` [PATCH] " Karthik Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqcyo6cnbb.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=abhijeet.nkt@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=paul.millar@desy.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).