From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811BFC25B08 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239465AbiHDUmE (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:42:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232924AbiHDUmC (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:42:02 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B87E5FAE7 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:42:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9C315486E; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:42:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YblpAcOdJfVYykENTgQDadFHnWFqGKR01yrWJP Tucp0=; b=eFT1TE9Nvy72+5Zn0xzxr/PecEVFWzZbXfNpVzHyE6kiiINOSpFX0J Au+9eW0RoR1QPdjaszdUSeTmOJNYieE4PUHlFhCZqXecZlbbTVjZRLMsOAmEEGrI 4JZ1JweTd4+93GC1j3HWZwqVU1bXpeA4Voo/OxnZ8wB2fPSjDoiKQ= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E3A15486D; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:42:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.145.39.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A301415486C; Thu, 4 Aug 2022 16:41:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Phillip Wood Cc: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Elia Pinto , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Jeff King , Phillip Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: cache glibc version check References: <53cffc06-ebb1-ac97-ceb4-4c242a82c68a@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 13:41:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <53cffc06-ebb1-ac97-ceb4-4c242a82c68a@gmail.com> (Phillip Wood's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2022 20:16:12 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E3411452-1435-11ED-827A-CB998F0A682E-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Wood writes: > As for the variable name I don't mind particularly either way, I chose > this name as the variable is checking whether we should use the glibc > tunables mechanism or not. Yup, but that becomes awkward when we decide to use the tunabules mechanism for something other than malloc debugging, and that is where my "is this the right name?" comes from. Thanks.