From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4753C2D0EC for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758A720757 for ; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 21:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="rzwc9jPY" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726687AbgDJV3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:29:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59244 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726638AbgDJV3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:29:13 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40914A0E0; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=J11MhelPfx7tdQLmmtbFzbzs9Kc=; b=rzwc9j PYHXSvPsq4W9t9CjUX9Vsx6rjRxdId3zvMrbwrACkapLjBV6+zx+FnoEsSPPaOCm Utn2KMvUwOGE7zic6Y+a7FWHO1DaUavRmEg4JQpiY1mWs2P7D6VLPqcVrn1cVs/r u1k8lBmmmBhDqMsY4CNAyApt7hjzzAp3/NSOg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=BshHMMIV17Zj8bgh2w7/xw5mqf5CRSao PkwWZoZr8FstfUv4p0oQsiVWohL4cRg8ks+FNnMmWT+Y4ri2J/S04X0XKRc1Gu/6 dDZ5R4JfmbHPZE9nu+4Bz5dhnE3zXHg6tYXUKtoQ3kxPhgyauXtq/xDd7hmNj9cD EeVudGFPBkM= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64E54A0DF; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D2E14A0DE; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 17:29:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Elijah Newren , Jonathan Tan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood123@gmail.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de, bturner@atlassian.com, sami@boukortt.com, "Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] rebase -i: mark commits that begin empty in todo editor References: Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:29:10 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2020 13:42:11 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 51943BF0-7B72-11EA-860F-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > So I am OK to rebase the other topic to v2.26.0; would that help? I > already saw there was some entanglement with the other topic in one > of the patches in this series, so... So I've done such a rebasing and queued the result to 'pu'. jt/rebase-allow-duplicate used to be directly on v2.25.0 but now it is on top of 'master'==9fadedd6, and these three patches are queued directly on top of that. Hopefully I can push out the result of today's integration with other topics in an hour or so. Thanks.