From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM, RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4008D20D0A for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 01:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750994AbdE3Bz7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 21:55:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:34933 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750904AbdE3Bz7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 May 2017 21:55:59 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f195.google.com with SMTP id u26so14387275pfd.2 for ; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:55:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=cVjGQ/alQr1Wgl4ml6/3rAFGflTIVx5Z65Fv9pWFsgE=; b=VmYia+AdFJ/44QubLYZSVVCNqyxg/J7uZaKl5hcanc+WGKhYPlwTsmdByzunWEDx+U x+XU28dypxmCMVb23Fh1VA5Bs1ffOteiohhHsH3JZLkVqjMICRrn7VQos+J08fi3q5NR ZvrXGBFgnAKCCJTW69OzxVzzYILHDIqXIvgXIFBrl9O/PfW8RL1k/vhUpNSYyahyog1f QwSZHQ0dX/SjTzr1yp9znoG4SlRoGbghdHLizxSiBKnKoKrc309vVuGKmFVze8qmjnc6 noo1PZZH7ri/LKidB+XZZ39tbKNPNUu5AB0eWDgCpHQ0g6dPgHFbWjEvlm1Yeo4kmPTp YaeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=cVjGQ/alQr1Wgl4ml6/3rAFGflTIVx5Z65Fv9pWFsgE=; b=l3RX6s7BzV/glk9XQdaNItOSVIy0w76WyN78chsqz50lWWSOf7MbDuo6qxIbn6rhf1 Z1aOCFtukCY/McST0ppaxl15eU4E9y+uGeflJnRR1VSf9OWoENjAJnoO0UNjaj5d+gEW Ij+k+2EJJyVKPKWpdKI6gCGMqifZ6fhkqJ+nJTknw1EptSI8/itq9n4tIOJ43L9oIoAO WwrDm2McCx1vxwY5KrvIG0KP5pSfaDa8sum57BF5oj5PKpBEvjOC74LN28xqXOSMcgcx /E4HD5YVorzjyR7LuWcbwgaZvUkt9RJfkO/3zKQe42ms1/TiUW3KCQVpKe/4d3Ngi8W3 xxiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCIqM9p2hU27Ud3usyOiy8lFQ7JCn1msuyJWipM4CIoIDXEm/vo 2IVrY6P58cOKNa2zPKI= X-Received: by 10.98.71.214 with SMTP id p83mr20655939pfi.236.1496109358363; Mon, 29 May 2017 18:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:0:1000:8622:f830:fc5f:a16b:f475]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u9sm19542915pgn.55.2017.05.29.18.55.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 May 2017 18:55:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] convert: add "status=delayed" to filter process protocol References: <20170522135001.54506-1-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <20170522135001.54506-5-larsxschneider@gmail.com> <64b1fda4-9f79-1bd8-ad6d-43196b808d61@web.de> <04ECEBE5-CAC8-4344-B07A-6B7A7C795C94@gmail.com> <832A4D04-F32F-4D1F-A5CE-3514F8469E63@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:55:56 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 30 May 2017 10:03:37 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > If you are depending on a single topic in 'next', it is better to > build on the tip of that topic, not on 'next', if you can figure out > where the tip is. In practice, while we are exchanging patches via > e-mail, there should be no noticeable difference either way [*1*], > ... And the forgotten foot note would have said something like this: *1* If you are depending only on a single topic in 'next', and other topics in 'next' do not interfere with your work, then by definition, your patches that apply cleanly on 'next' ought to apply cleanly on the tip of that single topic. ;-)