Re: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: abandoning a series

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>> +  A discussion on the list might convince you that your changes are
>> +  not such a good idea, in which case you are expected to explicitly
>> +  retract the topic, to releave the maintainer from having to worry
>> +  about it.

...

Thanks for improvements.

> Finally, maybe a rule of thumb as to how old a topic a topic should get
> before a "staleness" update is provided would be helpful, or maybe that
> is too contextually dependent / would potentially introduce some
> unwanted scheduling contract?
>
> Overall, I think the explicit guidance is helpful.

I've been working on streamlining my workflow to manage the "What's
cooking" report, and writing down guidelines with concrete numbers.

 * When the discussion seems to reach rough consensus that the
   latest round looks good for 'next', the topic is immediately
   marked as "Will merge to 'next'?" in my draft copy (note: I do
   not want to spam the list with "What's cooking" too often, but it
   is the document I work from, and it is updated multiple times a
   day).

 * After no negative opinions are seen on a topic in "Will merge to
   'next'?" state for about 36 hours, the topic is marked as "Will
   merge to 'next'".  I will merge such topics during the next
   integration cycle (note: I can only have up to two integration
   cycles per day due to time constraints).

 * Imagine that a topic was last updated more than 4 weeks ago.  If
   there are review comments on the topic that are left unanswered
   by the author for more than a week, and if nothing happens in the
   discussion thread other than inquiry on the current status, the
   topic is marked as "stalled".  I will try to notice and ping a
   stalled topic once or twice, but after that I may discard such a
   topic (which by the way I really hate having to decide to do so).

 * After a topic is merged to 'next', if nothing negative that needs
   fixing is discovered for 7 calendar days, the topic is merged to
   'master'.  I may shorten this depending on how complex the topic
   is.

THere may be more, but these are what I can think of offhand.