From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4526D305E32 for ; Sun, 17 May 2026 23:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779060671; cv=none; b=qRvn79cifVsYuvAfEzPJguSjEK8iXYyR1PsgmMYG4dDZYf+/EY0Rtz4jgA5WRBXjc59EXWPpw9xMqzbTmHgpZPgDVjR2jEeuis/J4XZRwTz1BrmlRYurtYUJTgkwyvT27uFJng42DH8RLt/rvVquhoPaWPsIiXJvyCkIo8aF1SE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779060671; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JKhpS5rjqszOGN54GH+AveoMZaP0Z1l5OY3cd0rOB7Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=stB1gks6IEu43mmc3X4UUBoU924ja/TYvHIIbvZVO0j+oK/OXZ8kb+9K3WOC6mPEx0y3lhl+UL1J8tTjtNGeZCH0LtNy4LX7WnAAn9J4PZ5WeErInj48QWd8Q8uBdLhHkFRcfLdtyX4J1slXZshe61Wp8aJRkxFGohUt8FLMZHA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=Yuw63Ckl; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=BdgsPDgW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="Yuw63Ckl"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="BdgsPDgW" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CE4140005D; Sun, 17 May 2026 19:31:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 May 2026 19:31:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1779060668; x=1779147068; bh=6yDMp1pPJ6 IAWm+EwbeBUk8Kk1mRoT+r7MjjZu68CmE=; b=Yuw63Cklb/l9Cy3aK9hv5hIVi4 8i6g83FPSm+scuL0FGYNcyoYyWpp+28g5UuH3RrpzJqLMuLWpwNpsgU1pj7QtFOx bkt7zY6JTizYIVCPurQEHOWRfm6/0zLp0L8NDHvqYdfQfDzCIshokO2q5SotCRcU aDik6g6pDIEdd6F+aIkDsMsFFIq6I+MBS4ln59IdE+DY0ajOtxjQzwghUFWROJA9 H1vDzUZxUPU3Vi+sHb3ln+s5ECd+wnc/l13dF2GV4psDoRZs6mVTnO7Qljqg8oJy cQXKY4brk1ZtiOGOo4tRkxdhon6SESRdS8hzjTM9smipMoCsWcxq2X5siqRA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1779060668; x=1779147068; bh=6yDMp1pPJ6IAWm+EwbeBUk8Kk1mRoT+r7Mj jZu68CmE=; b=BdgsPDgWS/4HKi7Unzy/fxckq+JyM6gzLbC1r5OukDmyZ9RIYru K8gs4Hc03T9W8NJsKW+TDrjpvIMdlS4lRLEHA1a3wcaVkgXaXtJ8ZAQsbiih3yiG eeMfuXewo1P4boUCy+5hediAa/QwiM2wzNegJPvH6qVGGTlEvRNc24M/NdCbgyF0 GgvRJO4TncR1OVt7P9tQs6R+bVWvagYEpOGperf6omUZvi3AlVNBqjUCpW7gerT9 tq7gK2j1QwPexXF8GSFbou5NdsB3TMkXLzuRlmVm4MeH54O5K3FFHueuMeit/N9S eJB76dSnQqV/b1cN+Brmch/NJrijxqfm8Vg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgddufeejfedvucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepiedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepkhhrkhgrsehsphhothhifhihrdgtohhmpdhrtghpth htohepshhtohhlvggvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgvfhhfsehpvghf fhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilhdrtghomh dprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohep ghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 17 May 2026 19:31:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kristofer Karlsson Cc: Derrick Stolee , Jeff King , Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] revision: use priority queue in limit_list() In-Reply-To: (Kristofer Karlsson's message of "Sun, 17 May 2026 17:26:06 +0200") References: <20260515041641.GA81292@coredump.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 08:31:06 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Kristofer Karlsson writes: > I don't want to pollute this patch with that change - should I start a > separate thread for it or just revisit this later? > (Perhaps I have too many optimization patches in flux already) Thanks for a great news. I agree that it is a good idea to find a good stopping point and make improvements step-wise, and the patch posted for limit_list() is probably such a good stopping point. If we do not see further comments on the current patch, let's merge it to 'next', cook it for the standard 7 calendar days or so before merging it down to 'master'. Further optimizations can be made on top of the updated 'master' branch as new and separate topics.