From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: William Hatfield <whatfield.git@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, glencbz@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com, ps@pks.im
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] submodule: add 'reversive' traversal options to foreach
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2026 13:25:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqecn2yh0r.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1F5D3AAF-3E5E-4AD0-A48B-90B9D545FB21@gmail.com> (William Hatfield's message of "Mon, 2 Feb 2026 16:02:16 -0500")
William Hatfield <whatfield.git@gmail.com> writes:
> Do you have any recommendation regarding names of these flags?
Not really. To be honest, I didn't even check to make sure what the
behaviour was that your "--reverse" was implementing ;-).
> Do you have a preference for: —postorder-traversal or —bottom-up-traversal?
If all three kinds of *order makes sense to the submodule traversal,
then --{pre,in,post}order would make sense. In other words, does
there exist a good answer to this question:
What does "--inorder-traversal" would do and when would it be
useful, as opposed to --preorder and --postorder?
Otherwise, the distinction between --bottom-up vs --top-down may be
sufficient to explain, and may explain the concept using more
familiar terms to us non-mathematics types.
> What about: —include-superpoject or —execute-in-superproject-last?
Depends on what you are trying to tell the command to do with these
options.
The former sounds as if you are saying "we usually do these things
only in submodules and never in superproject. But with this option I
am telling you to do the same in superproject after you are done
doing them in all the submoudles".
On the other hand, the latter sounds more like "do these things in
each and every repository (both submodules and the superproject),
but make sure the repository for superproject is handled after all
others."
Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-02 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-31 21:43 [PATCH 0/5] submodule: add 'reversive' traversal options to foreach William Hatfield
2026-01-31 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] t7425: add tests for reversive submodule traversal William Hatfield
2026-01-31 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] submodule: teach and plumb reverse-traversal behavior William Hatfield
2026-01-31 21:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] submodule: teach and plumb append-superproject behavior William Hatfield
2026-01-31 21:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] submodule: introduce reversive shorthand mode William Hatfield
2026-01-31 21:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] doc: document reversive traversal and related modes William Hatfield
2026-02-01 9:03 ` Jean-Noël AVILA
2026-02-02 21:10 ` William Hatfield
2026-02-02 18:52 ` [PATCH 0/5] submodule: add 'reversive' traversal options to foreach Junio C Hamano
2026-02-02 21:02 ` William Hatfield
2026-02-02 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqecn2yh0r.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=glencbz@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=whatfield.git@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox