From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A962B9B7 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 18:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760033901; cv=none; b=tvSbOzSw1kqGkakjtb9dbsQS7EZtIKqjenlYb1OE+ysVBSbm0B6efz6ebZckkaBDeoVG5BXHgGnsoZZfrtOArFqTLJX2qKNmDJelirdck3hNCHBGf8no4v16LnuQb4/qW4LqWh8r3Pg3vl1jQhfKv0s7O3C9b3LTvX+mbGh0cSE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760033901; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+8i0O444F2s+PCZwXXCBfM7jm7z3kF6VdlQSGQYjMko=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MwUOpH/6D5orDHqdMCiqq5Ihw6y6mgUAReSt1l8m6yfXszlnuV3ylTVTf11jvtsv8Xb8c1aWujjS9kT4Pj3YsjPpfHcwc51IpK/PPI6JBbSFja+5zU0l/VLVz1XnGwsWQk6d3BGOLfZwKPmD4DkOxDR224TLnSw8Tc+0ts+sMy8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=cfqgInvY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Xy4j0dGz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.150 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="cfqgInvY"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="Xy4j0dGz" Received: from phl-compute-05.internal (phl-compute-05.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034E7EC01E8; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 14:18:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-05.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Oct 2025 14:18:18 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1760033897; x=1760120297; bh=JJWAwRM8l/f6DeMBTNbp9YCxrOH02EMM0TVRwr9qaVA=; b= cfqgInvYZYXopvGdJ3jI9BxKeij15Yb4tqRfrl8eBFjFu1YP4V7HyW8WS3cHVkiz /f0TjLJ3FuEG+sJqZNAasuvZ3od5JhDyty1ES5J1GxYkoPWgNXm80UXAWnm0NU7y vJgQNUZGvBrZtXBqqr3+RKE6Of/gRxkiorndRDOPre2/UiJ4I8NlvBZQ4TuBuWGe VqfTv2j/M4SX07gRZX589xp9DVUo3T6XDGmIoR2uDCC064ujJvkL+qiMvtlEQPef UxV1iWF/GKYhL8N39MtIiIvIFR+YdrkwQhL0atwT6UDHD6LJQ3j/NKwh4p+Qxxs0 +jQv94HH0T7vx1JMS0zRPg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1760033897; x= 1760120297; bh=JJWAwRM8l/f6DeMBTNbp9YCxrOH02EMM0TVRwr9qaVA=; b=X y4j0dGzim2UDTnV9h4wCw2HOBaedkvhKsYf8wiSf3oTV1HKjJZGXK+Hf7ONGnA+0 FffmNTXMe/2AcnyhuBu8PiNtanl+sOu94eBxrv7LTrGwtlV+Q4Y7ekJE8nUgh13K NFWDWSqwDZYoULKXaksFN18dppGtaYl9J7gwuJdUng/RU3zQmYGB089dRHPsnDOL miQLiQb/g5/9TwZc5XEqb8yHOt4NRKqFu5BDrIeYULX3m+nuMZpIfFUpx/o6P77s F32kbJFRjznQoXHyAgwn/fh+GJp4eGJJ5lBsxma6xV1GBlTPqF5XNXjpNtRMiLMa LYqE+YVQeCe142aZLu+Jw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddutdeikeekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgfgsehtkefotddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihho ucevucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpeekgfdtuedvjeffgfehueefueeghfdtjefhgfekhffhteeiffetheelhedt gfehtdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeduuddpmhhouggv pehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepthhmiiesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtth hopegtohhllhhinhdrfhhunhhkudesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhr ihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpshesph hkshdrihhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgt phhtthhopehnvgifrhgvnhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehpvghffhesph gvfhhfrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhoohhthhhp rghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghsrdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinh esghhmgidruggv X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 9 Oct 2025 14:18:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Todd Zullinger Cc: Collin Funk , Christian Couder , Patrick Steinhardt , git@vger.kernel.org, Elijah Newren , Jeff King , "brian m . carlson" , Johannes Schindelin , Christian Couder Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] lib-gpg: allow tests with the GPGSM prereq first In-Reply-To: (Todd Zullinger's message of "Wed, 8 Oct 2025 22:37:02 -0400") References: <20251007122958.1089680-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20251007122958.1089680-3-christian.couder@gmail.com> <871pncdfrw.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 11:18:10 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Todd Zullinger writes: > I sent a series long ago to fix this issue¹, but it wasn't > picked up. > > Fixing the issue exposes broken tests which use the gpg2 > prereq. That breakage turns up in our CI and other build > environments, like Fedora's, but I was never able to > reliably trigger it locally and track down what was broken > about those test. > > I believe I asked about it again a few months later and it > did not gain any attention. > > I simply apply the patches locally and then disable those > tests -- tests which don't run reliably are not worth > running IMO. :) > > ¹ <20240703153738.916469-1-tmz@pobox.com> True, the archive shows that the two-patch series got no attention from anybody, it seems. Perhaps nobody was looking at the list at around the beginning of July last year? Let me pick it up belatedly, but I'd appreciate an extra sets or two of eyes while the issue is fresh in our minds. Thanks.