From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, ps@pks.im, shejialuo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [GSoC][PATCH] builtin/refs: add 'get' subcommand
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:50:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqecrwon2h.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923104533.21165-1-meetsoni3017@gmail.com> (Meet Soni's message of "Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:15:33 +0530")
Meet Soni <meetsoni3017@gmail.com> writes:
> While `git-rev-parse(1)` and `git-show-ref(1)` can be used to read
> reference values, they have drawbacks for scripting and discoverability.
> `rev-parse` performs DWIM expansion which is unpredictable for scripts,
> and `show-ref --verify` is difficult to discover and cannot read the
> direct target of a symbolic reference.
Well "refs get" is even harder to discover (it is not even in Git
2.50's manual that is available everywhere on the net), so difficult
to discover is not a good excuse. In a sense show-ref was invented
exactly to serve as something like "refs get" you are writing, so I
wonder if a better approach is to extend it instead of introducing
a new subcommand in a distant place from it?
Perhaps "show-ref --verify --no-deref" or something that does not
dereference but works directly on a symbolic ref?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-23 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 10:45 [GSoC][PATCH] builtin/refs: add 'get' subcommand Meet Soni
2025-09-23 16:57 ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-24 6:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-23 21:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2025-09-24 6:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-24 15:29 ` Ben Knoble
2025-09-24 17:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-25 6:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-25 18:08 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-25 18:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-24 6:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqecrwon2h.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meetsoni3017@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).