From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b5-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A5FD23C507 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 23:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756424426; cv=none; b=jNPZJQJjW6LQarcAFXXaEjhBqV+lhmWLSyvfgWYRDFvsdA+4zPpNFHwGPMgmtESgOyng3XefCvlPWXIVWghfClKsyshqEfZuE5vfgz2SlZP+c/1pVQ7/T3ooHZ3lPHcTVt91mfAXmBjo3mg9eHmexDtbiIXczBo1BnJjyJMvA3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756424426; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RFsfLTfDchpXs70maa6zMtL0vKyqbwS+WB0QwFXFFeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZH/TbyS+eQPTq+4yC8psOayDAVQ+6ZvbmSi5F2z2cKIk1y9mniMyljFhx+RQTedtZkJB8K8db40i42khOUqHS/xD5iL8rWtNGIYXWEkUI59rTyZiKujdBbXNnJwIzKyuVrtwnce2GwjO/GogOYFZeMDwDtWXSAuotbtbLcf+i+s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=KnvWKztk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=FbQPybI1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="KnvWKztk"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="FbQPybI1" Received: from phl-compute-04.internal (phl-compute-04.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351801D001DB; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 19:40:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-02 ([10.202.2.161]) by phl-compute-04.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Aug 2025 19:40:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1756424423; x=1756510823; bh=rY3hYNZXjl FBOJc/QKFeVPNi9e02Su1pr70zb1NCFrw=; b=KnvWKztkEZE+k9UnaeZLFGvjMC wIKZ9NvG8CvsW+oRnIVq8aYSWMsfcjv2IdbSTjX2Lh1Y1DHFrTjTfgfLcxFoRZK9 a1n6xMfvcmV30iBA28ACO03ObjNOb7SfXatC5B7EGSiOtcLToFaWNH3U51R4VCpA O/mifo2R+IeZ6lLGy8tiBu7aDkGrCJW7FSzZXkLe6OA9VkvlKgbVn8ENb1vuhwM/ j8ghbYMCUp8JK/NaOsPPZoQ4iYghKAq7uftLqZQRaYSUpvCmY6R5aJnVtRsXB3MS fd0mbBSzirQ7xcQOHmsBZK4k6JhiGvGIfpoQuxod2EtHjnYCH/9iXlsIrWcQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1756424423; x=1756510823; bh=rY3hYNZXjlFBOJc/QKFeVPNi9e02Su1pr70 zb1NCFrw=; b=FbQPybI1/qfU8lBrsz6KjuZmSM30Rf2+/Pv2weUrGgZtbgnq4Jv 8DuyLTLjMQDxL1AeSfmnFHfhWuvSXgoBo8kBFlKh1YYwWtMQe6YvOknZKxP6lyID YsUHVk5fymCx0HMVafhS6Vlmq6gH+daKwKceUiEK7Beq/UPIn0Cfg3exAt4to43p TKyx0QmERMitcWTBwi/4blhvsT1WdESJ7j+BdiA94sl0OrnCeGUU+WbSCDU2+ayU pPIbNbV+bXt3x/BcaIujA5zwPWquHfR433pHx2H4g/cQ4lT/VbDFtLe95OmrzpBw dkXiZyJhJFX9X4v5MAn+O2NI78TWCTv2Row== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgddukedvfeegucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhephffvvefujghffffkfgggtgesthdtredttdertdenucfhrhhomheplfhunhhiohcu vecujfgrmhgrnhhouceoghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepfeevteetjeehueegffelvdetieevffeufeejleeuffetiefggfeftdfhfeei geeinecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepgh hithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehs mhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprghmohhnrghkohhvsehishhprhgrshdrrhhupdhrtg hpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhi lhhlihhprdifohhougesughunhgvlhhmrdhorhhgrdhukhdprhgtphhtthhopegviigvkh hivghlnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhes phhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 28 Aug 2025 19:40:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Alexander Monakov Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , Ezekiel Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] optimize string hashing in xdiff In-Reply-To: <43459416-ced2-d551-40e3-6db594ca4520@ispras.ru> (Alexander Monakov's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2025 23:25:07 +0300 (MSK)") References: <20250728190520.10962-1-amonakov@ispras.ru> <43459416-ced2-d551-40e3-6db594ca4520@ispras.ru> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:40:21 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Alexander Monakov writes: >> Using xxhash() was merely a sample code path for technology >> demonstration, so the Rust adoption topic may want to pick a >> different code path to do its thing. > > My interest here is just speeding up xdiff in C, is that a welcome topic? It seems that the (side) discussion on the performance has concluded, and Ezekiel's new iteration of the Rust thing moved to a non-overlapping part of the system, so I do not see any reason to keep this topic out of 'next'. Is everybody OK for me to mark the topic for 'next' soonish? Any objections I overlooked? Thanks.