From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47D1E79E1 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2025 00:01:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752105675; cv=none; b=p2fLKn//NDyU7jLido0OSd9JjihYCUZr/Fl14pNJlja4vrei6F9jSSI+sGKpWsU5SKgv5eVWT54wwXSPCLyXpF/QKEZZECsua4ZgeQ0inPDprG12235Omgvg4HU/IULM0czmLC1A5fiKz8gxOS4r+u82oJBwnL+4wA0Z6xNRlws= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752105675; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wN5fXdSUZ+8rvAscqMubqqyq43fjbpHyyNnqGA6Xw/o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=eOuBh0Ok6e2DtKCx8fonsXRVW6Pu7mQu2NFqhkGllqdfUF+D1Di+ADeyYoh8NETKd3Jpr3Oa4xk2n0S2lgI7KXwn+MUGd0qMqk2tZNL6GXnfe+7bw8poB4XMJAY9crKYwHrKXHM8dqPgPDSOCnY8dqRjb78EJkZ92tPE/Hl/VP4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=AoKFPFTB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=JTbwwnmW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="AoKFPFTB"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="JTbwwnmW" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.phl.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404A7A0071; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 20:01:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-01 ([10.202.2.160]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Jul 2025 20:01:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1752105671; x=1752192071; bh=uK+o/gCBHM 4ffPP5k3Vms9wC9LsM4vlMUkCzQ2/7KcM=; b=AoKFPFTBSxoi0IbwV8F9XdTkk0 Lke2x7iO2tBxHx/+KQfuH38i8VgLGTXaQCn6shLw0ZS15lSDOOkj3HGKLvgLqpS0 Gf0f+5J1b5g0B6FMwgxfQb3oJocp54KL/okzUL2JbtuRZrrTKYJ7s4hSFHdKwD+I dJs8HPNJdoB4SzGbU9QoDpoTEcupVtppPyKHAyS2dqtjeoqYxUVn4nT8Gfn+I78l zLbqwUUii5DMYSijEdHEW3piHXzhHaHCohVqYweUYz6TzsRVM1ncKgaYJcS71/m+ 5yiqrBaHpdwkRuAIOJVHrZ30Ba2jNc6H/PtlOBxUkA5Wc8YweCubt9VU/zMQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1752105671; x=1752192071; bh=uK+o/gCBHM4ffPP5k3Vms9wC9LsM4vlMUkC zQ2/7KcM=; b=JTbwwnmW+bcTNwHOq9ZxAm5Il8Z5UK6etWiPYQs1Ff0aMqhYQyN yAFlpj04NBRYkpWDugbjoG2ykBYYysy28g+MHWRWe2BM9CBii5SnmkgXlh11sW7G mlkYzjigcUi72Ts3Tkt5sJLXViOHtL7eqsLDo9TrXsIsrT0RzfHxpDHKyiYQ12sP dvQoLin/6Hcf3v+TJkBunooIkyKlOUw6CAmIgGqxgiKuAynUnpB4W66aVs6a4gvz elMgasRWEenJW8Kr4M7MzyqE68/rgg9ZxZv7cEhzZsVrkyO66og+0Ss3kaXv2BHg SmSRBNFfIvPzFgP9J5p4GOzPTVQxc3MtBhQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdefkeelgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefhvfevufgjfhffkfgfgggtsehttdertddtredtnecuhfhrohhmpefluhhnihhoucev ucfjrghmrghnohcuoehgihhtshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeefveetteejheeugeffledvteeiveffueefjeelueffteeigffgfedthfefieeg ieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgih htshhtvghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeehpdhmohguvgepshhm thhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehmvgesthhtrgihlhhorhhrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epphgvfhhfsehpvghffhdrnhgvthdprhgtphhtthhopehnvgifrhgvnhesghhmrghilhdr tghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpth htohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: if26b431b:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 9 Jul 2025 20:01:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Jeff King , Elijah Newren , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2025, #02; Mon, 7) In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2025 10:46:47 -0400") References: Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2025 17:01:10 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Taylor Blau writes: >> * tb/midx-avoid-cruft-packs (2025-06-23) 9 commits >> - repack: exclude cruft pack(s) from the MIDX where possible >> - pack-objects: introduce '--stdin-packs=follow' >> - pack-objects: swap 'show_{object,commit}_pack_hint' >> - pack-objects: fix typo in 'show_object_pack_hint()' >> - pack-objects: perform name-hash traversal for unpacked objects >> - pack-objects: declare 'rev_info' for '--stdin-packs' earlier >> - pack-objects: factor out handling '--stdin-packs' >> - pack-objects: limit scope in 'add_object_entry_from_pack()' >> - pack-objects: use standard option incompatibility functions >> >> "pack-objects" has been taught to avoid pointing into objects in >> cruft packs from midx. >> >> Will merge to 'next'? >> source: > > I think that this one is ready to go. Since Elijah and Peff last > reviewed it, it hasn't changed substantially (other than a few > bugfix-related changes that were discovered while rolling this out at > GitHub). > > The series has been running on GitHub's production infrastructure for > the last month or two without issue, so I think this is good from a > stability perspective. > > I've CC'd Elijah and Peff here, since they were the last two to review > the series, but I don't think that they have any objections to this > moving along. OK. As they both seem to be active, let me wait for a bit and then mark it for 'next' unless we hear anything unexpected. Thanks.